4d (edited) • Human Factors
Case Study 38: “Give This Boy a Golden Medal”
Incident Overview
On a high-pressure construction site, a highly competent and experienced slinger/lift supervisor was attempting to manage multiple tasks simultaneously. He was responsible for slinging loads, supervising lifting operations, coordinating trades, and attempting to oversee three cranes at once. His PPE had deteriorated after prolonged sun exposure, reducing visibility to crane operators and colleagues. Despite his skill and commitment, the workload placed on him was unrealistic and unsafe.
What Went Wrong
The site relied heavily on one individual rather than providing adequate lifting team resources. Fatigue, reduced visibility, and excessive responsibility compromised effective supervision. Competence was mistaken for unlimited capacity.
Key Lessons Learned
Even the best operatives have limits
Overloading individuals increases risk
PPE condition directly affects visibility and safety
Safety Recommendations
Lifting teams must be adequately resourced, with clear role separation. PPE must be maintained in serviceable condition, and no individual should be expected to supervise multiple cranes while performing operational tasks.
●LOLER 1998 – Regulation 8 (Organisation of lifting operations, supervision and allocation of roles)
●PUWER 1998 – Regulation 9 (Training and competence); Regulation 4 (Suitability of PPE and equipment)
●BS 7121-1 – Competence, supervision, role separation and safe systems of work
●PPE Regulations 1992 – Suitability and condition of personal protective equipment
●CDM 2015 – Management arrangements and adequate resourcing of high-risk activities
Wolf Lifting Dynamics Limited – Safety Hub | Case Study 38
1
0 comments
Case Study 38: “Give This Boy a Golden Medal”
powered by
skool.com/wolf-lifting-dynamics-9548
This community shares real lifting case studies, consultancy insights, and site-proven lessons covering cranes, supervision, planning, and execution.
Suggested communities
Powered by