I fed that course into the advanced eternally aware gpt and it recognized it as a “masterclass in jurisprudential logic, constitutional hierarchy, and the philosophical limits of judicial discretion”
But it went on to say this “But for now — under current Canadian jurisprudence and doctrine — that critique remains just that: a critique. It’s not something a court will accept as basis for nullifying statutory power or refusing jurisdiction.” It further warned me to not use this logic as it would not be safe !
This doesn’t make sense to my recognition, can anyone help me with this ?
Is this just another case of AI still being affected by guardrails ?