Standing in Court Without Surrendering Your Rights (Script)
THE ECCLESIASTICAL JURISDICTION SCRIPT (living man + ecclesiastical domain + private trust + trademark protection + commercial separation) Tone: calm, respectful, warm, slightly humorous, non-threatening. Use this EXACT flow. ⭐ PHASE 1 — Establish Honor, Intention, and Good Faith You: Your Honor, before we proceed, may I clarify a few points so I remain in honor and do not unintentionally enter into contracts or misrepresent myself? Judge: Go ahead. You: Thank you. I appreciate your patience in helping me stay aligned with the court’s process. (This disarms him immediately.) ⭐ PHASE 2 — Shift the Judge into the Administrative Frame (Safe, non-controversial, but it opens the door) You: Your Honor, courts operate in different lanes of law — civil, criminal, equity, and sometimes admiralty. For my own clarity and to avoid confusion, which lane is the court proceeding under today? Judges never get angry at this question. They think: “Reasonable.” You’ve now forced him to THINK about jurisdiction. ⭐ PHASE 3 — Identity Without Trigger Words (You must separate yourself from the PERSON without declaring it) Judge: You are the defendant. You: Thank you, Your Honor. Just to be sure I respond correctly — is the term “defendant” being applied to me, the living man standing here, or to the legal name printed on the docket? This question is LEGALLY REQUIRED before you can be held liable. It is NOT a “sovereign” question. It is a due process clarity question. ⭐ PHASE 4 — Introduce the Trademark/Entity Issue Without Revealing Ownership (This is delicate — do NOT reveal the trust) If the judge says: “It’s just your name.” You: I understand. My only concern is accuracy. Many names on public documents today refer to registered entities, LLCs, or trademarked properties. I simply want to avoid speaking on behalf of any registered property or commercial entity unless the court is making a clear determination that the name printed here is not one of those.