9d • General discussion
Comments on my abstract
Hi everyone,
Sharing the abstract below for feedback before I take this paper further. I'd especially welcome blunt reactions on whether it reads as a genuine prior layer or just a relabeling of what existing frameworks already do — and whether the opening lands on a first read.
Abstract
Before evidence can be weighed, it must first be constituted as an evidential object. Every evidential evaluation rests on three components: a focal claim, the observations admissible as its instances, and what each instance contributes. Specifying them jointly — a prior methodological step I call evidential instantiation — is typically left implicit.I call their joint specification — a prior methodological step — evidential instantiation. This step is typically left implicit.
Examined through this tripartite structure, seven recurrent methodological difficulties — among them pseudoreplication, conflicting conclusions from the same data, and incommensurable meta-analyses — become intelligible as manifestations of a common structure. The same structure provides a common basis for comparing established methodological frameworks: because they were developed for different methodological tasks, each makes some components explicit while leaving others implicit or presupposed — rarely the whole. The present account specifies that step, complementing these frameworks.
I provide an initial formalization of this tripartite structure, making all three components explicit and inspectable at once, in terms that hold across domains. Making them explicit does not guarantee correct evaluation; it makes recurrent evidential difficulties systematically locatable — and thus diagnosable — in the claim, the admissible instances, or their contribution.
This is not a calibrated instrument. It specifies the evidential object that existing inferential frameworks presuppose before evidence can be weighed, leaving domain-specific calibration to future work.
Keywords: evidential instantiation; metascience; research methodology; measurement; evidence synthesis; reproducibility
3
6 comments
Comments on my abstract
powered by
skool.com/research-career-club-8446
Become 'go-to' research expert by delivering novel research; engaging outside academia; and building profile to amplify impact | Created by Prof Hanak
Suggested communities
Powered by