This may be one of the most important conversations we have in this community.
Zocdoc gets blamed a lot in DPC circles:
- “Low-quality patients”
- “Price shoppers”
- “High no-show rates”
- “Terrible ROI”
Some of that criticism is fair.
Some of it misses the point entirely.
Let’s start with an honest question:
What kind of patients actually use Zocdoc?
In our experience, they tend to fall into a few buckets:
- People who are frustrated with access
- People who are new to the area
- People who are used to transactional healthcare
- People who believe “covered = cared for” (until it isn’t)
- And yes—some are price shoppers
That doesn’t make them bad patients.
It makes them uneducated patients—and that distinction matters.
Where practices get Zocdoc wrong
Zocdoc is not:
❌ A relationship platform
❌ A loyalty channel
❌ A long-term acquisition engine
Zocdoc is:
✅ A discovery tool
✅ A moment of intent
✅ A chance to redirect the patient journey
The mistake happens when practices treat a Zocdoc booking like a win—when it’s actually just step one.
How we re-framed Zocdoc inside FirstCall DPC
We never built Zocdoc into our system as “marketing.”
We built it as a controlled intake valve feeding into GoHighLevel.
Here’s what that looks like operationally:
1️⃣ Zocdoc → GHL (email-based trigger)
Since Zocdoc doesn’t fire webhooks:
- Appointment emails route into GHL
- GHL creates the contact
- The workflow begins immediately
2️⃣ Immediate expectation setting
Automatic SMS + email:
- Confirms the appointment
- Clearly states: This is Direct Primary Care We do not bill insurance Membership is required
- Encourages early cancellation if it’s not a fit
This alone filters a huge percentage of misaligned patients.
3️⃣ Speed + human touch
- Staff attempts live contact quickly
- Education > selling
- If no response: 3 attempts Then cancellation
No chasing. No begging.
4️⃣ Payment before care
- Membership payment links sent via GHL
- No payment = no visit
- Automation handles reminders and cancellations
This protects physician time and resets the power dynamic.
5️⃣ Post-visit ownership
Once converted:
- Zocdoc becomes irrelevant
- Patient moves into: GHL Ongoing education Community (Skool) Long-term relationship
Zocdoc did its job. We take it from there.
The uncomfortable truth
Zocdoc patients are not inherently “bad.”
But unfiltered Zocdoc patients can absolutely destroy:
- Staff morale
- Physician bandwidth
- Patient acquisition cost
The difference isn’t the platform.
It’s the system around it.
The real question for this community
- Should DPC clinics use Zocdoc at all?
- If yes, under what conditions?
- At what point does Zocdoc get turned off?
- What patient behaviors tell you someone can transition from transactional to relational care?
This isn’t about right vs wrong.
It’s about intentional design.
Curious to hear how others are handling this—especially from clinics who’ve either:
- Made Zocdoc work, or
- Ripped it out entirely and never looked back.
Let’s talk.