Hey, I recently watched this video, and it felt like a direct critique of what you preach (test levels are dropping ref. ranges need to be double or tripple atleast):
So, 2 major questions I have for your from this video:
- Is the "1950s Decline" Just a Flawed Comparison? Given that laboratory testing methods before the 1970s and 80s were highly primitive and fundamentally different from today's technology, how can we confidently claim testosterone has dropped since 1950? Aren't we just comparing apples to oranges by pitting historical, uncalibrated tests against modern mass spectrometry?
- Are We Confusing Laboratory Artifacts with Environmental Crises? If the famous generation-over-generation drop in US health data completely disappears once you correct for the 2004 laboratory switch from immunoassays to mass spectrometry, is it possible the "testosterone crisis" is a statistical illusion rather than an environmental apocalypse?