Quick one for anyone running Claude Code on knowledge work rather than code.
There's a built-in command, /insights, that reads your last X sessions and produces a report on how you're actually using it. Mine just landed and it's worth sharing.
What it gives you:
- The areas you spend most time in (mine: client emails, quoting, workspace reorgs, daily inbox rhythm, strategic research)
- Your interaction style, with one sentence that nails the pattern
- Where Claude misfired and why (mine: filling gaps with plausible guesses instead of verifying, pulling from the wrong source file, output formatting that won't paste cleanly into Outlook)
- Specific CLAUDE.md additions to stop the same friction recurring
- Features to try (Skills, Hooks, MCP servers) tied to your actual usage, not generic advice
- "On the horizon" workflows you could build given your patterns
For me it surfaced that my three-way workspace split was working, but my email-drafting conventions weren't documented anywhere Claude could see. For someone running a coaching practice it might surface that client-note structure is fine but session-prep is repeatedly being rebuilt from scratch. For a researcher it might flag that source-citation conventions are missing. For an agency, that brief-to-deck handoffs keep needing the same corrections. It reads the seams in your system, whatever that system is.
That's exactly the gap ICM is meant to close, and /insights makes it visible.
Takes a minute to run. Just type /insights. Worth dropping a screenshot of your "At a Glance" section in the comments if you give it a go, would be interesting to see the patterns across the group. 🙏