11h • 🛠️ Show Your Work
See behind the veil - full architecture
This took a few weeks.
Not building.
Training. Tweaking. Breaking. Locking.
Running the same flows over and over until the architecture stopped bending.
Everyone here knows ICM.
What this is… is what happens when you actually live inside it long enough.
Not theory.
Not clean diagrams.
Real load.
A few things only showed up under pressure:
- The moment where orchestrator wants to execute… and you don’t let it
- The cost of letting workers “figure things out” vs forcing briefs to be exact
- How fast token bloat creeps in when you don’t treat load surface as a constraint
- The difference between a rule you wrote… and a rule you had to write three times
At some point, things flipped.
The system stopped feeling like something I was managing…
and started feeling like something that was holding shape on its own.
That’s when the real work began.
What’s in here is not “a good setup”.
It’s what survived:
- multiple passes of weekly audits
- repeated cold starts
- real production friction
- and a lot of “this felt right but didn’t hold”
A few things I’d pay attention to if you explore it:
- Where boundaries are enforced (not suggested)
- What got locked into rules vs left flexible
- How briefs are treated as contracts, not prompts
- How little the orchestrator actually does
Also interesting:
The extraction itself.
That process alone shows you what was structural… and what was just personal preference.
If you’re deep into ICM already, you’ll see where this goes.
Curious what breaks for you — or what holds better than expected.
7
25 comments
See behind the veil - full architecture
skool.com/cliefnotes
Jake Van Clief, giving you the Cliff notes on the new AI age.
Leaderboard (30-day)
1
+826
2
+814
3
+526
4
+480
5
+459
Powered by