**How Are You Going to Win a Fight?
Developing Your Methodology** One of the biggest problems I see when talking to fighters—especially amateurs—is simple: They have skills, but no actual idea how they’re going to win a fight. They can hit pads, wrestle, roll, drill… but when you ask, “What’s your methodology? What are you trying to do?” you get a blank stare. This is a thinking man’s sport. If you’re facing real, competent opposition, you can’t rely on vibes and conditioning. You need a way to win. 1. What Is Your Methodology? A methodology is just your repeatable way of winning—a simple, structured plan that fits: - Your personality - Your physical attributes - Your prior skills - Your risk tolerance - Your cardio and pace - Your ability to adjust under fire It’s not a rigid script; it’s the strategic backbone that dictates your choices. 2. Example: My Original Methodology For me, the plan was always straightforward: Use amateur boxing combinations to pressure them backward, pin them against the fence, and remove their footwork. Once their number-one defensive weapon was gone, I had two clear paths: 1. Knock them out when their movement options were gone. 2. Take them down, get on top, and stay on top. Simple. Effective. Repeatable. This is what a methodology looks like—a plan that compounds your strengths and forces opponents into your world. 3. Meta Shifts: Learning From the Dagestani Blueprint Every few years, the meta evolves. Right now, the modern Dagestani grappling system—using rides, turks, wrist rides, leg rides, breakdowns—is dominating because it: - Drains opponents - Controls them with minimal risk - Forces them into slow, losing positions - Builds naturally toward backs, finishes, and top-dominant submissions (kimura, darce, RNC) You don’t have to be Dagestani to use the concepts. The point is: elite teams have an actual system. A consistent pathway to victory. 4. Why Most Fighters Don’t Have a Plan When I speak to fighters, especially those with only a few bouts, the conversation often goes like this: