Coverage: October 31–November 6, 2026, using online-first publication dates. This week produced one formal consensus statement and several useful practice refinements. Nothing is independently practice-changing, but the hamstring consensus is worth reading alongside last week’s rehabilitation meta-analysis. 1. Diagnosis, Rehabilitation, and Return to Sport after Athletic Hamstring Injury: An ICCUS Society Consensus Statement International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, November 1, 2026 Type: Modified Delphi expert consensus Full article and DOI Methods and findings: Seventeen sports physical therapists with hamstring-injury expertise completed the final Delphi round. Consensus was defined in advance as at least 80% agreement or disagreement. Fifty-four of 60 statements reached consensus across examination, rehabilitation, and return-to-sport domains. The panel supported: - Consistent injury terminology and appropriate use of MRI or ultrasound - Individualized, criterion-based rehabilitation - Progressive tissue loading and restoration of length tolerance - Early neuromuscular and kinetic-chain training - Gradual running, agility, and sprint exposure - Hamstring peak-force and endurance testing - Workloads approaching game-level speed, volume, and density - Using previous GPS data when available - Athlete-reported readiness as part of the decision - Pain-free sprinting before unrestricted return The panel proposed strength within approximately 10% of previous data or relevant population values, but this remains an expert-derived benchmark rather than a prospectively validated clearance threshold. Evidence strength: Moderate as a structured expert framework; low for specific thresholds and recurrence prevention. The Delphi process followed CREDES guidance and obtained strong agreement, but the panel was small and composed primarily of physical therapists. Consensus does not demonstrate that its criteria reduce reinjury or improve performance.