Business investment (return or benefits)
Do you ever sit up at night thinking about how you will succeed and how it will expand?
Do you ever think how you can last or outlast future competitors in the same or to be in the same markets?
How do you justify cutthroat competitors paying their employees minimal wages and benefits and forcing you to do the same “just to survive” in the same type business margins?
Consider and remember this:
“Once” and “when” companies gain shareholder equity any and all future endeavors “investments to expand profits further” if someone’s not able to attain those profits the value of that stock drops because the investors who invested their money “failed to see any financial benefit from their investment.”
Why do big corporations and industries get “black eyes” for paying profits over the considerations of their employees and adequate pay/brnefits?
Well consider:
  1. Employees “can always” be replaced.
  2. Investors “especially with large sums of money” are harder to find.. especially in “your” business interests.
  3. As more people get paid less with less benefits that pool of investors and investment niche become smaller, smaller, and smaller. (For those specific areas of interest with lump sum investment)
  4. If companies/corporations were not interested in “financial” bottom lines with CEOs being the paid “bad person” for this accomplishment how many individuals would be paid “adequate livable “ wages with fair benefits?
  5. Would employees keep jumping from job to job looking for higher and higher pay and benefits if paid actual benefits and not “skeleton” benefits?
  6. Only time to consider livable wages and benefits perhaps only full time employment criteria?
  7. Why?
Consider the effects of “get quick” responses of nitrogen related fertilizers that removed and burned all the microbiomes of the soil for quick fast and high yields of animal feed to cattle.
Using this, paying for the “fertilizer” paying for the use of “machinery”, “fuel/maintenance” and etc. The farmer initially got a “increased yield” sure..
But not told to the farmer it would cause “flooding and drought bigger issues” because the microbiome built in and retained the durability of both flooding water and extreme drying conditions
And would actually cost the farmers more money down the road to take care of the same land they previously paid.. (and at the fertilizer company “whim of cost”, farm vehicle maintenance increased parts and costs, increasing fuel costs.. do i really need to continue?)
Where if they just stayed “status quo” never effected by heavy rain years or dry spell years because of the microbiome maintained and grown all those years.
“What if” we actually had “adequate” livable wages and defined compensation at “realistic retirement pension dates or expected payment amounts for time employed in types of work”…
Actually held each company “accountable financially” for each type of pension offered “paid in” said “screw the CEO bottom-line profit bad person process”..
Do you think half of the corporations and companies would be as “rich” and “greedy” as they are today?
And soon as one of the corporations/industries tried to “lobby” their ability to reduce livable wages and defined pension plans they get a public “black-eye” and ignored from the government agencies.
To include ANY/ALL CHEMICALs/ingredients consumed by animals/humans/clothing gets tested and after rigorous verification not allow corporations/industries to “lobby” for “acceptance” of anything that does or could affect the health of their employees unless their doctor is fully knowledgeable and qualified “competent” to provide in-depth information about each chemical being available to include vaccine/shot requirements.
And if there either isn’t enough “data or inadequate evidence of data” the doctor cannot provide it and cannot get a “kickback” or “benefit” directly/indirectly if referring someone to get that.
I mean…
Maybe I am just from a “different” perspective on what “should” be…
But same time “know” because corporations and industries set the precedent of what is “acceptable” because if not approved they will just spend more money on another representative to “approve” their “innocent” legislation that harms the everyday worker and families.
But what do I know.
No business degree.
No college degree.
Just a male with “utopian” mindsets angry with today’s behavioral sink impacts with Calhoun Rodent experiment taking place first hand with no one “battling an eye lash” with the domino tiles falling down.
And what’s even more “funny” even if someone else agrees with what I say…
We are all “so divided” either by “political parties/race/age/generations/etc.”
Nothing will ever change to fix the sole problem.
“Capitalism and Free Market”
How long before the “winners take all” move from all the massive profits of United States to Europe, Russia, China, Africa. And etc. To rob the average person of even more and more money slowly tapping away livable wages and benefits?
Sure, cost of living goes up and then so does demand for payment and benefits.
But of this equation, does everyone get that same benefit and wages or just a smaller percentage breakdown until almost everyone except the ones “tapping the system” are the only ones left while everyone else suffers?
5 years
10 years
30 years
50 years
100 years
0 votes
2
0 comments
David Clemons
3
Business investment (return or benefits)
Axis Leadership
skool.com/axis-leadership
A place where leaders can grow, learn, and connect with others who share the same vision for success. Better People. Better World.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by