There's a prompt format I keep coming back to because it turns any content into something I can actually use months later. Podcast transcripts, articles, book chapters, meeting notes. All of it.
I built a prompt system that forces structured, reusable output from anything you feed Claude. I've been using this inside AI for Life as one of my core workflows, and I wanted to break it open so you can run it yourself.
Here's the system and the prompt.
---
**The Core Idea**
You give Claude a piece of content and ask it to extract wisdom across nine specific categories. Each bullet point has a hard constraint: exactly 16 words. No more, no less.
Why 16 words? Sixteen words is tight enough that you can't hide behind vague language. Every bullet has to be specific.
---
**The Nine Sections**
1. **SUMMARY** . 25 words covering who is presenting and what they discussed.
2. **IDEAS** . 20 to 50 bullets of raw ideas pulled from the content.
3. **INSIGHTS** . 10 to 20 bullets. Refined, abstracted versions of the best ideas. Higher signal.
4. **QUOTES** . 15 to 30 exact quotes with speaker attribution.
5. **HABITS** . 15 to 30 practical habits mentioned in the content.
6. **FACTS** . 15 to 30 valid, verifiable facts about the world.
7. **REFERENCES** . Every mention of books, tools, projects, art, or inspiration sources.
8. **ONE-SENTENCE TAKEAWAY** . 15 words capturing the single most important essence.
9. **RECOMMENDATIONS** . 15 to 30 actionable recommendations drawn from the material.
---
**The Rules That Make It Work**
- Bulleted lists, not numbered (keeps it scannable)
- No repeated items across sections (forces the AI to actually think, not recycle)
- No items starting with the same opening words (prevents lazy pattern output)
- No warnings, disclaimers, or filler. Only the requested sections.
Without that last rule, Claude will pad the output with "Note: this is a summary and may not capture all nuances..." You don't need that. You need the insights.
---
**How I Actually Use This**
**1. Podcast Processing**
I grab the transcript (most podcasts publish them, or you can use a transcription tool), paste it into Claude, and run the extraction. A 90-minute conversation becomes a single structured document I can scan before a follow-up call.
**2. Research Stacking**
When I'm learning a new topic, I'll run extraction on five or six different sources and then compare the output. Ideas that repeat across multiple extractions are signal. Everything else is noise.
**3. Meeting Notes**
After any important conversation, I drop my notes into the extraction. The HABITS and RECOMMENDATIONS sections alone have changed how I follow up after calls.
---
**The Prompt You Can Use Right Now**
This works in claude.ai, the Claude app, or Claude Code. Copy it, paste your content at the bottom, and run it: ```
Extract surprising, insightful, and interesting information from the following content.
Output these sections:
- SUMMARY: 25 words, who is presenting, what is discussed
- IDEAS: 20-50 bullets, exactly 16 words each
- INSIGHTS: 10-20 bullets, exactly 16 words each (refined, abstracted versions of best ideas)
- QUOTES: 15-30 exact quotes with speaker attribution
- HABITS: 15-30 bullets, exactly 16 words each
- FACTS: 15-30 bullets, exactly 16 words each
- REFERENCES: All mentions of writing, art, tools, projects, inspiration sources
- ONE-SENTENCE TAKEAWAY: 15 words capturing the most important essence
- RECOMMENDATIONS: 15-30 bullets, exactly 16 words each
Rules:
- Bulleted lists, not numbered
- No repeated items across sections
- No items starting with the same opening words
- No warnings or notes, only the requested sections
[PASTE YOUR CONTENT HERE]
```
---
**Try It This Week**
Pick one piece of content you consumed recently that felt valuable but you can't quite recall the details of. Run the extraction.
If you try it, drop your results in the comments. Curious what sources people run this on.