I’ve been quietly studying why some faceless channels grow fast…while most never get past 100 views. It’s not editing. It’s not luck. And it’s definitely not consistency alone. It’s how they start. Here’s the mistake I keep seeing beginners make: They pick a niche based on what they like instead of what the algorithm already understands. So they end up posting… with no demand, no structure, and no direction. Here’s a simple framework that works better: 1️⃣ Search first, don’t guess If people aren’t already searching or watching it… it’s an uphill battle. 2️⃣ Steal structure, not content Look at what’s already getting views and reverse-engineer the format. 3️⃣ Think in systems, not videos 1 viral video is luck. A repeatable format is a business. Most people don’t fail because YouTube is “hard” They fail because they start without a system. If you’re trying to get into YouTube automation, focus less on “going viral”… and more on building something that can work twice. If you want, I can break down a simple channel setupthat beginners can actually follow without wasting months. Just comment “START” or DM me 👍 (Been seeing some interesting results with this lately.)

Hey Creators, One month into my new AI role in Tech… and wow—that flew by. Here’s what I’ve learned so far: 1. People want results yesterday 2. They expect AI to do everything… instantly… from one vague prompt… with zero setup Like—create it today, expect it to run the company tomorrow, then get frustrated when it doesn’t. Meanwhile I’m over here like… I’d love AI to cook, clean, and cut my grass too—but we’re not quite there yet 😄 A big part of my job right now is resetting expectations: - What AI can do today - What it can’t do (yet) - And when a request isn’t an “AI agent”… it’s actually a full-blown enterprise solution in disguise Because there’s a difference between:“Help me automate a task”and“Build me a fully integrated system that replaces an entire function” And we’ve got to be honest about that. All that said… this is just Month 1 heading into Month 2. Let’s just say—it’s about to get very interesting.

Hey Creators, I found this while looking for something to listen/watch in the background on YT while I work on one of my AI projects. I thought it was a movie but it's a bunch of short clips obviously done with AI and strewn together to make movie. Minimal dialogue, mostly visuals. The visuals are stunning but I only could watch the first few minutes of it then I went to the comments. I don't think many of these people realize this was done with AI. Granted it must've taken a lot of time and credits to put so many short clips together to make a movie that is over 1 hour long! I think they should have made a short movie instead because I found it boring hence why I could only watch the first couple of minutes. Or are we retrograding back to silent films now? Hmmm 🫤 What are your thoughts?

Hey Creators, I’ve always been creative first. AI just took that to another level. For a long time, that creativity stayed outside corporate life. Not anymore. In my new role leading AI training, I ditched the boring posts and turned a Slack channel into an experience. Instead of text-heavy updates, I built: - Short-form videos - Visuals that click instantly - Infographics people actually save Same message. Different delivery. And it worked. People paid attention.They engaged.They learned. Now it’s one of the most talked-about channels in the company. Because here’s the shift: Information doesn’t stick.Experiences do. No one goes back to reread posts.But visuals? Those get saved and used. If you’re building in this AI era, don’t just focus on what you say. Focus on how it lands. The creators who win design the experience.

Hey Creators, Can't believe it's Friday AGAIN. Time is flying by. Any AI deep dives this weekend? For me, I'm trying to get caught up on all the lastest AI news. I'm behind because I've been too busy lately.