User
Write something
šŸ”’ Q&A w/ Nate is happening in 4 days
Pinned
šŸš€New Video: Claude + HyperFrames Just Solved Video Editing
In this video I'm showing you how to edit videos end to end using Claude Code as the orchestrator, with HyperFrames handling motion graphics and video-use handling the trimming. You drop in a raw video, tell it what you want in natural language, and it cuts the filler words, syncs animations to your exact timestamps, and renders the final video. I walk through the full setup, the prompting style that actually works, and how to iterate fast with the new timeline editor. GITHUB REPO
Pinned
šŸš€New Video: Claude Design Builds Beautiful 3D Websites Instantly (full tutorial)
I used Claude Design to rebuild my AI Automation Society site and my personal site in about 20 minutes each, and the results felt way more polished than what I had before. In this video I walk through the full process of going from an idea to a deployed website, including how to plan with Claude, use Claude Design's tweaks and comments, push everything to GitHub, and host it on Vercel. I also break down what actually eats your usage limits so you can stretch every session a lot further
Pinned
šŸ† Community Wins Recap | Apr 11 – Apr 17
From first AI roles and paying clients to live receptionist systems and enterprise training deals - this week inside AIS+ showed what happens when execution meets consistency. šŸš€ Standout Wins of the Week inside AIS+ šŸ‘‰ @Griffin Maklansky went from being laid off to landing a role as an AI Workflow Builder in just 1 month. šŸ‘‰ Duy Nguyen moved from fear to action, built a full AI-operated business, and already landed 2 paying clients through word-of-mouth. šŸ‘‰ @Narsis Amin built a fully working AI restaurant receptionist handling bookings, availability, and CRM logging end-to-end. šŸ‘‰ Michael Wacht closed a deal to deliver AI training for 200 employees, stepping into enterprise-level impact. šŸ‘‰ @Dion Wang received his first official testimonial, validating real client results and around 40 hours/month saved. šŸŽ„ Super Win Spotlight | @Debbie DeMarco Bennett Debbie joined AIS+ at a moment when AI was starting to disrupt the business she had built for 13 years. Instead of staying scared, she decided to learn how to work with the technology. Since joining, she has: • Automated multiple parts of her business and freed up major time • Built her own admin dashboard and secure internal systems • Started DeMarco Bennett AI • Landed her first client and began rebuilding their business systems Her biggest shift? From thinking ā€œI’m not technical enoughā€ to realizing that with the right support, iteration, and community, she could absolutely build. Debbie’s journey is proof that you do not need a tech background - you need the willingness to learn, ask questions, and keep building. šŸŽ„ Watch Debbie’s story šŸ‘‡ ✨ Want to see wins like this every week? Step inside AI Automation Society Plus and start building assets that compound šŸš€
šŸ† Community Wins Recap | Apr 11 – Apr 17
Logistics Company Lost $2.8M Because Shipping Documents Had Wrong Warehouse Codes šŸ”„
Shipping logistics company. Moving $180M in goods annually. One field on shipping documents kept causing problems: warehouse location code. Cost them $2.8 million in one year. THE WAREHOUSE CODE PROBLEM: Shipping document has field: "Destination Warehouse" Should contain: 4-digit code (e.g., "WH47") Often contained: - Old warehouse codes (facility closed 2 years ago) - Typos ("WH47" typed as "WG47") - Full addresses instead of codes - Wrong region codes Result: Shipment goes to wrong warehouse. THE CASCADE: Wrong warehouse code triggers: - Delivery to wrong facility - Customer calls: "Where's my shipment?" - Investigation time: 2-3 hours - Rerouting shipment - Additional freight cost - Delivery delay - Customer service time - Possible contract penalty Cost per misdirected shipment: Average $4,200 THE ANNUAL IMPACT: Tracked 12 months: - Total shipments: 14,400 - Misdirected due to wrong warehouse code: 673 (4.7%) - Average cost per incident: $4,200 - Total annual cost: $2,826,600 4.7% error rate. $2.8M problem. THE PATTERN: Most errors came from: - Manual data entry (clerk types code from email/PDF) - Copy-paste errors - Outdated customer shipping instructions - 3PL partners using old templates THE SOLUTION I BUILT: Shipping document validation system: - Document arrives (PDF, email, EDI) - System extracts warehouse destination - Auto-validates against active warehouse database - Flags invalid codes BEFORE shipment processed - Suggests correct code based on delivery address - Requires human approval for flagged shipments Won't let invalid warehouse code enter system. THE RESULTS: Before automation: - Shipments with invalid codes: 673/year (4.7%) - Cost of misdirected shipments: $2.8M annually - Customer complaints: 89/month - Investigation time: 220 hours/month After automation: - Shipments with invalid codes: 47/year (0.3%) - Cost of misdirected shipments: $197,400 annually - Customer complaints: 11/month - Investigation time: 28 hours/month
Welcome! Introduce yourself + share a career goal you have šŸŽ‰
Let's get to know each other! Comment below sharing where you are in the world, a career goal you have, and something you like to do for fun. 😊
1-30 of 15,902
AI Automation Society
skool.com/ai-automation-society
Learn to get paid for AI solutions, regardless of your background.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by