User
Write something
🔒 Q&A w/ Nate is happening in 6 days
Pinned
🚀New Video: How to Sign AI Workflow Clients (Without Posting Content)
This video breaks down how to sign AI workflow clients without posting content. No personal brand. No audience. Just a simple way to land AI workflow clients even if you’re starting from zero. If you want to know how to sign AI workflow clients without posting content, this is exactly how I’d do it today. Hope you enjoy!
Pinned
Want to get featured in front of 500,000+ people?
If you've sold an AI automation to a client, any tool, any industry, I want to hear about it. I'm collecting case studies to break down on the channel. This is your chance to build authority, get your brand out there, and showcase what you've built. 🎁 Bonus: I'll be analyzing all submissions and sharing the trends with you: what's selling, which industries are buying, and where the opportunities are. So even if you don't get featured, you'll benefit from the data. 👉 Fill it out HERE Takes 5 minutes. You can submit multiple projects.
Want to get featured in front of 500,000+ people?
Pinned
🏆 Weekly Wins Recap | Feb 7 – Feb 13
Big contracts, First clients, Real cost savings.This week inside AIS+ was about execution over excuses. Here are a few standout wins inside AIS+ 👇 👉 @Glenn Marcus closed a $60K Agentic Engineering contract in 72 hours after launching his new agency site. 👉 Ai Stromae built an automation saving a client €30K per year - €1K paid upfront with referrals coming. 👉 @Mike Thomson landed his first real paying client through persistence and smart follow-ups. 👉 @Jeremy Aune closed his first AI voice assistant client - with expansion already in discussion. 👉 @Meir Heimowitz cut $1,400/month in business costs using Claude Code automations. 🎥 Super Win Spotlight: @Glenn Marcus | $60K in 3 Days Glenn launched his new agency site on Thursday. A friend forwarded it to a CEO. By Tuesday, a $60,000 contract was signed. But this didn’t happen overnight. Through AIS+, Glenn sharpened his thinking around real use cases, agentic systems, and applying AI to actual business problems - not just tools. That clarity gave him the confidence to pivot his consulting company into an Agentic Engineering firm. The result? Right message. Right positioning. Right timing. $60K in 5 Days His story is proof that when preparation meets opportunity, things move fast. If you’re AI-curious or already building, this is what momentum looks like. 🎥 Watch Glenn share his story 👇 ✨ Want to see wins like this every single week? Join AI Automation Society Plus and turn learning into real outreach, real clients, and real momentum 🚀
🏆 Weekly Wins Recap | Feb 7 – Feb 13
A top AI company is about to be labeled a national security risk by its own government.
The Pentagon is considering labeling Anthropic a National Security Risk. Not a foreign adversary. Not a hostile state. A U.S. AI company. Here’s what happened. Anthropic signed a $200M Department of Defense contract in 2025. Claude became the first major AI model integrated into classified military workflows. Then in January 2026, the U.S. launched a major strike in Venezuela. Reports surfaced that Claude was used during the operation. Afterward, tension exploded. Why? Because Anthropic insists on two limits: 1️⃣ No mass surveillance of Americans using its AI 2️⃣ No fully autonomous weapons without a human in the loop The Pentagon’s position is clear: If it’s legal, the military must be allowed to use AI for it. Anthropic’s position is equally clear: Just because something is legal does not mean it should be automated or scaled by AI. Now the Defense Department is reportedly considering designating Anthropic a “supply chain risk.” That label is normally used for Chinese or Russian entities. If applied, it would effectively blacklist Anthropic from the entire U.S. defense ecosystem and force contractors to cut ties. This is bigger than one company. It sets precedent. If AI labs must comply with “all lawful purposes,” then private sector guardrails disappear. If AI labs can refuse certain government uses, then tech companies become a check on state power. Four possible outcomes: 1️⃣ Anthropic caves and lifts restrictions 2️⃣ Pentagon cuts ties and others fill the gap 3️⃣ A negotiated compromise 4️⃣ Courts and Congress step in and redefine military AI law Every major AI lab is watching this unfold. Here's the article: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/pentagon-issues-threat-anthropic-190953699.html This is not about Claude. This is about who decides how powerful AI gets used. Government? Or the companies building it? Where do you stand?
1
0
A Thought on Decision Fatigue in AI Automation
One thing I don’t see discussed often is how mentally demanding this space can be. Not because it’s complicated, but because every build requires dozens of decisions: Which tool? Which structure? Which niche? Which offer? Which strategy? Over time, it’s not the work that slows people down, it’s the constant decision-making without clear feedback. That quiet mental overload is real. I’m curious: 👉 What decision are you currently overthinking the most in your automation journey?
1
0
1-30 of 13,350
AI Automation Society
skool.com/ai-automation-society
A community built to master no-code AI automations. Join to learn, discuss, and build the systems that will shape the future of work.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by