Anthropic just passed OpenAI in business adoption for the first time, and within hours both companies dropped offers to lock users in. Codex gave 2 months free. Claude Code bumped limits 50%. Here's why I think we're in a "free sample phase" where the real product isn't the subscription, it's you. Use it like crazy, but build projects flexible enough to swap tools the day pricing resets.

Angle 3 is here — this is the one that changed how I prompt entirely. I used to get inconsistent results from AI. Same tool, completely different quality every time. Turned out the issue was my structure — or the lack of it. The TCRIE formula fixed it. Five steps, same order, every single time: T — Task. Don't describe the process. Describe the end result. "Write a post that gets 10 replies" not "write a post about AI." C — Context. Who you are, your background, your audience. AI writes for the average person without this. With it, it writes for you. R — References. Give AI something to study. A creator you like, a past email that worked, a format you want to match. It can reverse-engineer good work. E — Evaluate. What does a good answer look like? Word count, banned words, tone, what success means. Built-in quality control. I — Iterate. Ask for 3 versions minimum. The first output is always a draft. Most people stop there and wonder why AI isn't that useful. I built a full guide with real copy-paste templates for each step + 4 full examples including a cold email, a Threads post, and a learning plan. PDF is in the post . Try the formula today and tell me what you noticed — especially whether the Iterate step changes your results. 😃Questions:-> 1. Which framework your using in your work?? 2. What you think about this framework? 3. Any tips t improve more in the prompts??