Angle 2 is here — and this one might be the most important of the series. Angle 1 was about commands (ELI5, TLDR, Humanize etc.) Angle 2 is about WHY most people still get bad answers even after using those commands. The answer: no context. AI is like a brilliant assistant with zero memory. Every time you open a new chat, it knows nothing about you — your background, your goal, your audience, your constraints. So it gives you the average answer. The "safe" answer. The generic answer. Here are the 4 context blocks I give AI before every important prompt: 1. WHO YOU ARE — your role, experience level, situation 2. YOUR GOAL — what success actually looks like 3. YOUR AUDIENCE — who will read or receive this 4. CONSTRAINTS — word count, tone, what to avoid Real example from today: Without context: "Write a post about productivity." Result: 300 words about waking up early and making lists. With context: "I run a Skool community for freelancers. Write a Threads post about the one productivity habit that changed how I handle client work. Audience: freelancers 20-35. Max 120 words. Conversational, no fluff." Result: Something I'd actually post. Same AI. Same question. Completely different output. The PDF is in the post. Try giving all 4 context blocks on your next AI prompt and drop your result below — I want to see what changes for you. 😲Let's discuss you're way or framework to work with AI??