๐Ÿš€ RAG Battle: Gemini File Search vs. OpenAI Vector Store. Which one to choose?
Hello community! ๐Ÿ‘‹
The AI automation landscape is moving at breakneck speed. One of the current keys is equipping our agents with specific knowledge (RAG) without dying trying.
Until recently, this required setting up complex pipelines with Pinecone, Supabase, etc. But recently, both ๐—š๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ด๐—น๐—ฒ (๐—š๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ) and ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—”๐—œ have launched solutions that promise to drastically simplify this process.
I've been analyzing both options thoroughly, comparing costs, ease of use, and integration (especially thinking about workflows like n8n), and here is the final verdict. ๐Ÿ‘‡
๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐——๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: W๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ?
The short answer is: It depends on your priority. Are you looking for maximum economy and speed, or the most elegant integration into your workflow?
๐Ÿฅ‡ ๐—š๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ ๐—™๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—”๐—ฃ๐—œ (๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ž๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—˜๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐˜† & ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†)
If your priority is low cost and getting it running fast, Gemini is unbeatable.
  • ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐—”๐—น๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ญ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ผ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜: Storage is currently free. Indexing a 120-page PDF costs less than $0.15. It's ridiculously cheap compared to the competition.
  • ๐Ÿš€ ๐—ก๐—ผ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ: Forget about managing external vector databases. Google takes care of chunking, embedding, and storage. Just upload the file and you're done.
๐Ÿฅˆ ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—”๐—œ ๐—ฉ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ (๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ž๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป)
If you value a clean workflow and integrated tools within the OpenAI ecosystem.
  • ๐Ÿง  ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: It shines especially if you use n8n. You access the vector base directly via the OpenAI API, without weird extra nodes.
  • ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ "๐—•๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐˜-๐—ถ๐—ป" ๐—ง๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜€: It allows adding file or web search directly in the agent configuration, eliminating the need for external tools like Perplexity in many cases. It's a much more elegant design.
๐Ÿ“Š ๐—ฉ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜‡๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป (๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฐ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜€)
I have prepared detailed infographics for the community that visually summarize:
  • The quick verdict.
  • The brutal difference in prices.
  • How they differ from traditional RAG and their limitations (watch out, they aren't magic!).
๐Ÿ‘‡ Check out the attached images to get the full picture! ๐Ÿ‘‡
๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: W๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ?
Personally, I am using Gemini for projects with a large volume of data where cost is critical, but I prefer OpenAI's Vector Store for quick agents within n8n due to the cleanliness of the flow.
W๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚? Have you tried these new "easy" systems yet? Or do you remain loyal to traditional RAG (Pinecone/Supabase) to have more control?
Let me know in the comments! ๐Ÿ‘‡
6
3 comments
Joan Marquez
5
๐Ÿš€ RAG Battle: Gemini File Search vs. OpenAI Vector Store. Which one to choose?
AI Automation Society
skool.com/ai-automation-society
A community built to master no-code AI automations. Join to learn, discuss, and build the systems that will shape the future of work.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by