Oct '25 • Wins 🌟
Competitor launched a $997/month "AI automation service." I checked their workflows. It's 4 nodes and takes 3 minutes to build. They have 47 paying clients.
Competitor launched a $997/month "AI automation service." I checked their workflows. It's 4 nodes and takes 3 minutes to build. They have 47 paying clients.
I'm not even mad. I'm impressed.
THE DISCOVERY
Saw their ad on LinkedIn:
"AI-Powered Email Automation"
"Transform Your Inbox With Intelligence"
"$997/month"
Landing page had:
- Testimonials
- Complex diagrams
- "Proprietary AI technology"
- Case studies with big numbers
Looked legit.
THE CURIOSITY
One of their clients is in my network.
Reached out casually.
Me: "How's that AI email thing working?"
Him: "Game changer. Saves me 2 hours daily"
Me: "Mind if I see it?"
Him: "Sure, they gave me access to the workflow"
He screenshared.
THE REVEAL
It was n8n.
4 nodes total:
1. Gmail trigger (new email)
2. OpenAI node (summarize + suggest reply)
3. Slack notification (with summary)
4. Google Sheets logger (track emails)
That's it.
No complex AI.
No proprietary technology.
Just OpenAI API + basic automation.
Cost to run:
- OpenAI API: ~$15/month per client
- n8n hosting: $5/month (shared across all clients)
Total cost per client: ~$17/month
They charge: $997/month
Margin: $980 per client
THE MATH
47 paying clients × $997 = $46,859/month
Costs: 47 × $17 = $799/month
Profit: $46,060/month
For a 4-node workflow.
THE BUILD TEST
Had to know: How long does this actually take?
Opened Skada.ai
Typed:
"Gmail trigger for new emails, use AI to summarize and suggest reply, send summary to Slack, log to Google Sheets"
Skada built it:
- Gmail integration
- OpenAI summarization
- Reply suggestions
- Slack notifications
- Sheet logging
- Error handling
Time: 2 minutes 47 seconds
They're charging $997/month for 3 minutes of work.
THE MARKETING BREAKDOWN
Checked their website copy:
What they say:
"Proprietary AI-powered email intelligence system"
What it is:
OpenAI API call
What they say:
"Advanced natural language processing"
What it is:
Standard GPT-4 summarization
What they say:
"Real-time cross-platform synchronization"
What it is:
Slack webhook
What they say:
"Enterprise-grade data analytics"
What it is:
Google Sheets row
Every feature is rebranded basics.
THE GENIUS PART
They're not scamming anyone.
Clients are happy:
- Actually saves them time
- Works reliably
- Support is responsive
- Price feels premium
The service works.
The value is real.
The margin is just... massive.
THE TESTIMONIALS
Their site has 23 testimonials:
"Worth every penny" - Saves 2 hrs daily
"Best investment this year" - Inbox finally manageable
"Can't live without it" - Revolutionary
None are fake.
Service actually delivers.
But here's the thing:
Same result, $50/month would be fair.
They charge $997.
And everyone's happy.
THE WAKE-UP CALL
Me to their client: "You know I could build this exact thing for you?"
Him: "For how much?"
Me: "Maybe $200 one-time, $50/month hosting"
Him: "Seriously?"
Me: "Yeah, it's 4 nodes"
Long pause.
Him: "I'm paying $997/month for 4 nodes?"
Me: "Yep"
Him: "I feel stupid"
Me: "Don't. Their marketing is excellent"
THE REALIZATION
They found the perfect formula:
1. Take simple automation
2. Add OpenAI API
3. Call it "AI-powered"
4. Wrap in premium branding
5. Charge 50x fair price
6. Deliver actual value
7. Keep clients happy
It works because:
- Non-technical clients
- Don't know what's possible
- Don't know what things cost
- Value the outcome, not the tech
THE OPPORTUNITY
Started offering the same workflow:
My version:
- Same functionality
- Better customization
- Built with Skada in 3 minutes
- $150 setup + $40/month
Reached out to 6 of their clients.
5 switched.
Client savings: $957/month each
My revenue: $40/month each
Still profitable for me.
Massive savings for them.
THE COMPETITOR'S RESPONSE
Word got back to them.
They sent a message:
"You're underpricing yourself"
"Clients pay for value, not cost"
"You'll never scale charging $40/month"
They're not wrong.
THE ETHICAL DILEMMA
Are they ripping people off?
Technically no. Service works.
Are they overcharging?
Absolutely yes. 50x markup.
Should clients know?
Probably. But they're happy.
Is this genius or predatory?
Maybe both.
THE BUSINESS LESSON
Two viable models:
High-margin model (them):
- $997/month
- 47 clients
- $46k revenue
- Premium positioning
- Same 4-node workflow
Low-margin model (me):
- $40/month
- Need 1,175 clients for same revenue
- Budget positioning
- Same 4-node workflow
Which is smarter?
Their model is more profitable.
Mine is more ethical.
Both work.
THE TEMPLATE
Their exact workflow in Skada:
- Gmail trigger
- AI summarization
- Slack notification
- Data logging
Takes 3 minutes to build.
You could:
- Charge $997 like them
- Charge $40 like me
- Charge anywhere in between
The choice is yours.
THE QUESTION
Is it wrong to charge $997/month for a 3-minute build if:
- Clients are happy
- Service works perfectly
- They're saving 2 hours daily
- They feel it's worth it
I genuinely don't know.
But I do know: With tools like Skada, the barrier to entry is gone.
Anyone can build this in 3 minutes.
Not everyone will charge $997.
Should they?
Who else has found competitors charging insane margins for simple workflows?
21
21 comments
Competitor launched a $997/month "AI automation service." I checked their workflows. It's 4 nodes and takes 3 minutes to build. They have 47 paying clients.
skool.com/ai-automation-society
Learn to get paid for AI solutions, regardless of your background.
Leaderboard (30-day)
1
🔥
+7563
2
🔥
+5044
3
🔥
+3527
4
+3133
5
+1433
Powered by