I am conducting an ongoing experiment in Premonition. So, when I was going over this video under classroom contents, I had to look up the difference: Summary of Differences • Clairvoyance is about extrasensory “seeing”—obtaining information about things outside one’s physical perception, mostly focused on the present.[thecontentauthority +2] • Premonition is about “foreseeing”—getting emotional or instinctive signals about future events, often with a sense of urgency or warning.[nation +1] Both are considered psychic phenomena but operate in distinct ways: one is rooted in the present by vision, and the other in the future by intuition.

Hi everyone — I’m trying to locate a decades-old New England TV news story (possibly from an ABC affiliate, roughly 30–50 years ago) about a psychic group that reportedly issued an “if–then” statement involving hurricane formation or redirection as a demonstration or threat. The target or motive I no longer remember — it might have been political, social, or even ideological — but the general idea was that this individual or group claimed they could influence the weather through collective psychic focus, and they publicly tied that ability to a real-world consequence if/then whatever their agenda was. All I remember is my surprise that such parapsychology related topic is mentioned in mainstream media so I paid close attention as a devoted follower of this genre but never heard of such reporting ever since. After extensive searches through news archives and databases, I’ve found no recordof such a broadcast. Related material includes: - 1960s–80s Project Stormfury reports on scientific hurricane seeding; - modern “weather weapon” conspiracy coverage (HAARP, etc., repeatedly debunked); - parapsychology and CIA Stargate Project pieces on remote viewing and influence experiments — but no psychic-weather stories. It may have been a local affiliate piece that was never digitized or perhaps conflated with fictional media from that era. While checking this with Grok, Perplexity, etc, we also explored terminology. This isn’t premonition or clairvoyance (seeing the future) but an attempt to influence which future unfolds — collapsing a probability field toward a chosen outcome, especially via shared focus (“where two or more meet in my name…”). In current literature this seems closest to collective intention or group intention, the concept studied in PEAR’s mind–matter–interaction research and Lynne McTaggart’s Intention Experiments. ➡ Questions for the group: 1. Has anyone ever come across anyrecord, mention, or memory of a psychic group making such a claim or being covered by New England news in that era? 2. And in parapsychology circles, is collective intention the most accepted term for this group-based influence on future outcomes, or is there a more precise phrase? This is my main objective to identify the term that precisely covers the work how an individual or a group can focus INTENT to collapse quantum superposition into a specific desired outcome.

As long as our leaders operate from a scarcity-driven and controlling mindset, knowledge about psychic abilities will continue to be discredited and marginalized. Yet, behind the scenes, these same abilities are often utilized by them — from military applications to platforms like Keen.com

The video presentation mentioned déjà vu in correlation with premonition — an interesting yet somewhat confusing link, as the two are quite different. Premonition involves foreseeing something before it happens, while déjà vu feels more like a confirmation — the sense that we’ve already experienced the moment we’re currently in. I’m currently conducting an ongoing experiment in the realm of premonitions and would be happy to connect with practitioners who are either experienced in, actively exploring, or interested in exploring this phenomenon.

Telepathy In the video, we hear the question: “Who had the original thought?” My question, however, is this: what if these kinds of experiences are actually resources for our human evolution toward Non-Verbal Communication (NVC)? My wife, who is from Taiwan, speaks only a little English. I know just a few words in Chinese. And yet, we communicate just fine—largely thanks to our shared NVC, which bridges the gaps where language fluency falls short. (Though, I must admit, AI has now advanced to the point where it can provide astonishingly precise translations!) What role does trust play in all this? It certainly helps—but is it truly necessary?