Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More
393 contributions to AI Automation Agency Hub
Day 6 Onboarding page complete
Day 6. Finally got the onboarding page complete and have ordered the business cards. Day 6 was kinda slow especially because I lost momentum on Day 5 but im getting that momentum back. Im gonna start outreach in the next 3 days no matter what. The next 2 days i will be making sure everything is refined and on par before i start outreaching.
2 likes • 2h
Nice progress! Getting the onboarding page and business cards done is a big step. Don’t worry too much about losing momentum on Day 5 — the important thing is getting back on track. Now the real test starts with outreach. Good luck over the next few days! 💪
I was losing hope, but I finally booked the 1st meeting💪
Hey everyone, a week or so ago I posted about the fact I was offered a job from the first company I visited during my in-person outreach trips. While I would gain great experience working for their company, I am reluctant to accept to offer, though it is still on the table. I feel there will be more value in getting a client --> delivering on your service, than only being involved in only one area of the entire business and development process. In the meantime, I have been continuing my in-person trips in my local area. I have compiled a large list of about 60 company prospects that I could provide my service to. B2B SaaS companies, marketing agencies, and fintech agencies is what I have been targeting for the past week. These have been the more high-volume and busy companies of the lot, and for the past week I have done walk-in visits. Some of them said they were too busy at the moment. Some of them asked for my contact info to follow up (they never did). Others just said no upfront. I was losing hope as I thought my strategy was good (though not perfect in hindsight). Still, I pushed on, and today it was worth it. I was able to book my first discovery meeting with a small web app development company. I spoke with the owner at a time when he was busy, but was able to close the meeting quick enough, and he seems interested. This shows that there is a demand out there for AI implementation/consulting services, you just have to look hard enough and smart enough for the right kinds of businesses. If someone says "no", it's ok. You can be rejected 100 times over, and all it takes for your outreach to be worth it is to get one "yes". 👌
2 likes • 2h
Congrats on booking the first meeting! 💪 60 prospects and all those “no’s” before getting a “yes” is a good reminder that outreach is really a numbers and consistency game. The fact that you kept going after the rejection is probably the hardest part. Good luck with the discovery call.
Building custom n8n + AI workflows for HVAC & Home Services — let’s connect!
Hey everyone! 👋 ​I’ve been focusing on building automated B2B outreach and CRM integration systems for home service businesses (specifically HVAC contractors). ​My main stack revolves around: ​n8n for custom workflow automations ​Claude / OpenAI API for personalized icebreakers & communication ​Airtable & Softr for lead tracking & client dashboards ​I’m here to connect with other agency owners, automation builders, and developers to share insights, discuss workflow setups, or collaborate on projects. ​What’s everyone building this week? Feel free to drop a comment or DM me if you’re working with n8n or AI outreach systems!
1 like • 2h
Nice stack. I’m also working heavily with n8n and AI automation, especially around lead qualification, CRM-style workflows, and connecting different tools through APIs. The HVAC/home services niche is interesting too. I’d be interested to see how you’re structuring the outreach and CRM side of the workflow.
Why 90% of home service "speed-to-lead" systems fail (and how to fix the drop-off)
Most local service businesses (HVAC, cleaning, roofing, plumbing) don't have a traffic problem. They have a response-time leakage. Everyone sets up the standard flow: Website Form $\rightarrow$ Zap/Webhook $\rightarrow$ Email alert to the owner $\rightarrow$ Owner calls back 2 hours later. By the time the contractor dials, the homeowner has already booked with the competitor who answered first. When auditing these drop-offs across contractor pipelines, here is the architecture shift that actually fixes conversion: 1. Kill the static email notification Contractors are on roofs or in crawlspaces. They do not check email. The trigger must immediately route a priority push or ring dispatch directly. 2. The 60-Second Window is real Conversion drops by nearly 8x after the first 5 minutes. If a high-intent quote request hits during business hours, the system should bridge a live two-way call between the visitor and the office in under a minute. 3. Deterministic first, AI second Don't put an unpredictable LLM in front of a hot inbound quote. Use strict, deterministic routing for the speed-to-call handoff. Save AI strictly for edge cases like parsing messy after-hours SMS replies. Curious how other builders are tackling the mobile handoff when business owners are constantly out in the field? What’s your preferred fallback when dispatch is busy?
0 likes • 2h
I like the deterministic-first approach. The first priority is making sure the lead gets acknowledged and routed quickly, then AI can handle qualification or edge cases after that. For the fallback, I’d probably use an instant SMS to the lead plus a priority queue for the team, with retries if nobody picks up. That way a busy dispatcher doesn’t mean the lead just disappears.
Sometimes, simpler automation is better. ⚡
While building workflows, I’ve been learning that adding more steps doesn’t always make a system better. A good workflow should be: ✅ Easy to understand ✅ Easy to test ✅ Easy to troubleshoot ✅ Focused on one clear goal For example, instead of creating a complicated follow-up sequence with 20+ actions, it can be better to start with a simple flow: New Lead → Immediate Response → Wait → Follow-up → Check Reply → Next Step Then test it, see what happens, and improve it based on real results. The goal isn’t to build the most complicated workflow. The goal is to build a workflow that actually works. What’s your approach—simple workflows first or build everything at once?
1 like • 2h
I agree with this. I prefer starting with the simplest version that solves the actual problem, then adding complexity only when there’s a real reason for it. It also makes testing and troubleshooting much easier. A workflow doesn’t need to look complicated to create value.
1-10 of 393
Yonas Workayehu
6
879 points to level up
@yonas-workayehu-6369
🤖 AI Automation & Agent Builder

Active 40m ago
Joined Aug 13, 2026
ethiopia
Powered by