Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More
Clief Notes
55k
5.0
Free
8 contributions to Clief Notes
The social cost of asking another person
Hi everyone, I have just reached level 2 and would like to make a first post of my own. I have always been interested in technology, economics, and human behavior, but only recently started writing about how they connect. How AI is used inside our systems is the focus here. It is what brought me here, and why ICM makes sense to me. I also like to explore how we humans behave with these systems. I am sharing an essay I originally wrote in Portuguese and translated into English for this community. It explores the social cost of asking another person for help, and how AI changes that choice. Asking a machine can spare us the embarrassment of admitting what we do not know, or the judgment that sometimes comes with an answer. I look at how that changes whom we turn to, what we trust, and how we relate to one another.
@Alexandre Freitas Losing the fun is a part of that price I did not write about, and it may be the most expensive one. When one of those weird questions turns into an idea, take it to a person who might disagree, because the machine tends to agree with whoever is asking.
@Pol Cusco Privacy is a cost I did not count: asking a person exposes not only what you do not know but also the question itself, and some questions cannot leave the room. On bias, the one we already know is that the machine tends to agree with whoever asks, so a simple test is to ask the same question twice, once leaning each way, and trust only what stays the same.
Multiplayer AI: one ICM, a whole team
Using ICM alone makes one person fast. Using it as a shared knowledge base makes a whole team fast and consistent. I call it an organized organisation 😂 The hard part isn't the AI, it's conflict management. I enforce four steps in code, not prompts: - Resolve conflicts: Git or a shared drive, depending on the case - Permissions and visibility: who edits instructions vs. who edits data - Handle stale files: give new information dates and context - Full auditability: every request is logged My setup today: 7 people on community-based research. I'm the maintainer (rules). Everyone else is a member (data). They can suggest rules, but I approve them. The AI even flags broken rules to me: "he wants to do this but can't, check it out". Still unsolved: stale files. Expiry dates or events help, but assigning them when a file is created is the hard part. For now, expired files stay put, the AI traces linked files to infer why, and asks me when unsure. Every failure updates the rules. If you're building team ICMs, I'd love to compare notes. Technical or not, message me. 🤝
@Pascal Pollack both, because they serve different moments. The list is for the review, one per session and grouped by subject. The condition lives inside the file, next to the fact, because that is what the AI reads months later. And if the condition names its source by the exact file name, like "valid while pricing.csv has no 2027 column", a plain text search for that name finds every file that depends on it when the source changes, which covers part of the graph question from @Nuno Silva without building a graph.
@Nuno Silva Agreed, a condition that names pricing.csv is already one of those links. So when a source changes you can follow those links from it to the files that name it, then to the files that name those, and stop wherever a reviewed file stayed the same, the way some build tools stop rebuilding when an output comes out unchanged. That keeps the warnings to the files that can really be affected.
🗂️ ICM Series 06 — I Had the Files. Now How Do I Find Anything? 🔎
⬅️ 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗩.: 𝟬𝟱 — 𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗜𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 │🏠 𝟬𝟬 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘│ 𝗡𝗘𝗫𝗧: 𝟬𝟳 — 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝗼𝗼𝗻 ➡️ Note: Press on the links above to navigate to each series or home. At the end of Post 05, my Knowledge System was able to process documents, extract their contents and recognise unchanged files. A great achievement and another step forward. However, there was a bit of a problem. Just because you have the information you need doesn't mean you can find it. Imagine thousands of documents. Somewhere in there is the information you are looking for. But which file does that information sit in and where exactly within that file? It's the needle in the haystack. I certainly didn't want to ask an LLM to read everything each time. Remember, I don’t have tokens burning a hole in pocket. 😅 🔎 𝗦𝗼, 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗱𝗼 𝘄𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗳𝗳? From Post 05, I already had the extracted content stored in JSON files on disk. Those files contained the information extracted from the original Word, Excel and PDF documents, along with details of where it came from. Technically, those files could be searched directly. However, with potentially thousands of documents in mind, I wanted a better way to organise and search that information. That's where SQLite came in. Essentially a lightweight database that could act as a searchable catalogue. The idea was simple: 📁 Original documents (Word, Excel, PDF) —> ⚙️ Extracted JSON files (stored on disk) —> 🗂️ SQLite catalogue (searchable index) —> 🔎 Matching passages and their source locations. Instead of going through all the extracted files for every search, SQLite could help locate matching information through its search index. Most importantly though, this was still deterministic processing, not AI reasoning.
🗂️ ICM Series 06 — I Had the Files. Now How Do I Find Anything? 🔎
@Stephan Vollmer tks! On superseded versus removed, the tombstone itself could carry the difference. A superseded one points to what replaced it, and a removed one keeps the date and the reason, with nothing to point to. Either way, a search for the old phrase finds an answer instead of silence.
@Stephan Vollmer tks! I had a related concern when preparing material from my private vault for publication. I prepared the public material separately and kept the record of what I excluded, and why, inside the vault, because that record could reveal the information being withheld. That is why your idea of a historical lookup with its own access controls makes sense to me.
What Can We Build Together?
Over the past few days, I’ve had some fascinating conversations here in this community, including a private chat with @Bryson Bossley . Those conversations got me thinking. And last night, I couldn’t stop thinking. One thought led to another. Ideas connected. Questions became bigger. And somehow, I ended up writing a speech and turning it into a video. So please, WATCH THE VIDEO FIRST. And if you recognize yourself in what I’m saying, if something in that message resonates with you… Come back and read this. ——— What Can We Build Together? 50,000 minds. Thousands of skills. Countless ideas. And yet… most of us are still trying to succeed alone. Think about that for a moment. What if the greatest opportunity in this community isn’t the next AI tool, another course, or another business? What if it’s the person reading this right now? Someone here might have exactly the knowledge you’re missing. Someone else might need exactly what you already know. And the strange thing is… Neither of you even knows the other exists. Isn’t that a tremendous waste of potential? I made this video because I believe we’re overlooking something extraordinary. It’s not another tutorial. It’s not a sales pitch. It’s a question we should all be asking ourselves. What could we achieve if we stopped trying to do everything alone and started combining what we’re already good at? Maybe we don’t need another thousand ideas. Maybe we need to connect the people who can bring them to life. And maybe it starts right here. Not with another complicated system. Not with another promise of success. But with people discovering each other. So let me ask you three simple questions. 1. What are you genuinely good at? 2. What do you need help with? 3. What would you build with others? Don’t overthink your answers. You don’t need to impress anyone. You don’t need to sell yourself. Just be yourself. Because somewhere among the people reading this, someone might have exactly the missing piece you’ve been searching for.
What Can We Build Together?
That was incredible! I joined this community only recently, but this is exactly the feeling! @Pascal Pollack lets go!
Who's here? Drop your intro.
Tell us three things: 1. What you do (job, industry, student, career-changer, whatever) 2. What brought you to Clief Notes 3. One thing you're trying to figure out right now related to computing or AI I'll respond to every single one. And read each other's intros too because the person who's stuck on the same problem as you might already be in this thread. I'll go first I am Jake, I have been working in tech for 15 Years, building with Generative AI for 3 Years straight now! Excited to teach and learn! That's it. Simple, scannable, gives you data on who's joining and what they need, and keeps the feed clear for content that retains people past week one.
Hi Jake, how are you? I am Valmor, from Brazil, a Business Analyst II in partner operations. For a few months I have been working with agents to close the gap between what the team does, what the systems record and what the reports end up saying. I built most of it by logic, and some pieces of the reasoning were missing. I had even written that the criterion behind a question is worth more than a repertoire of answers, and your content gave that idea a beginning, middle and end. It has already improved my work: after your video on nodes as nouns and links as verbs, every number that repeats across my notes now lives in one place. Right now I am figuring out how to check the numbers an agent calculates. Quotes I already check against the source with a script, and numbers are the next step.
1-8 of 8
Valmor Ricardo Reichel
4
75 points to level up
@valmor-ricardo-reichel-6179
https://www.linkedin.com/in/valmor-ricardo-reichel/?locale=en-US

Active 9h ago
Joined Oct 28, 2026
Powered by