One thing I’ve noticed about AI is this. Most people aren’t getting bad results because ChatGPT is bad. They’re getting bad results because they’re being vague. AI doesn’t need you to be technical. It needs you to be clear. The moment you tell it: - who it’s supposed to be - what the outcome is - what not to do the quality shifts immediately. That’s what I’m breaking down in my AI Driven Business Summit session. Not “advanced prompts.” Just a simple way to talk to AI so it stops guessing and starts helping.

Welcome 🥳 to the 500 new members this week… And, I'm posting a "promot" for Chat GPT right away if you want to try it out. :-) Then feel free to upload your results here. If you don't want to use Chat GPT, you can simply upload a few real pictures. Pictures that show your life right now. I'm curious. 👉 Here's the Chat GPT prompt: "Please create a portrait image of me based on all the information you already have about me. So a kind of vision board, or rather a live board. Include everything you've already noticed from our conversation so far in this image. Create this image in the cartoon Pixar style." I'll post mine in the comments

Two people can use the same AI art generator and get completely different results. Most of the time, the difference isn’t creativity. It’s prompt clarity. Prompts don’t just tell the AI what to make. They shape the outcome. Small shifts like adding a mood (dreamy), a style (editorial), or a color palette can take an image from random to intentional. I’ll be breaking this down during my summit session, AI Art Prompt Essentials, and showing how small prompt shifts can make a big difference in your results. How confident do you feel in your AI art or image prompting skills right now?

December 27 was the day it happened. One unexpected event. A real curveball. The kind that dents life plans and knocks the wind out of you for a bit. And at 56? You don’t dramatize it—but you do feel it. The thing is… this wasn’t my first curveball. So I did what you do. I got back on my feet. Slowly. Quietly. Honestly. And here’s what surprised me most: Getting your flame back has nothing to do with posting more. Or announcing that you’re “back.” Or hyping your own visibility. It comes from showing up for others. • Commenting with real care • Replying without pitching • Offering your best advice because someone asked • Supporting, not performing • Being useful, not loud That’s community. Yes, the flame carries a bit of notoriety, “I’ve been here. You can lean on me. You can trust me.” But it’s also earned. Through consistency. Presence. Relationship. So if you’re asking yourself today: “How do I want to show up?” Try asking instead: Who can I help? Who can I support? Who can I build a real relationship with—or collaborate alongside? That’s what the flame actually symbolizes. Not status. Not content volume. But shared momentum. And I’m deeply grateful for the people in my Skool communities who kept showing up like that—for me and for each other. 🧡 💬 Be honest—have you lost your flame recently? Or are you finding your way back right now? Are you frustrated you haven't gotten it by now?

I’ve been testing the same instructions in both Canva Code and Google AI Studio, and I’m noticing that Google AI Studio tends to interpret my intent more accurately and delivers results closer to what I request upfront. For those actively building AI-powered tools or workflows, which do you find more effective in practice: Canva Code or Google AI Studio?