looks like I may be entering the cycle 2 miniapp competition afterall. It’s been a busy month and I didn’t think I will be able to make an entry . Introducing FitProof. Your pocket fitness buddy coming to Nimq pay. FitProof rewards you $NIM for completing your home workouts. Set goals and get rewards for following through. I think that’s awesome. I hope you guys love it. thank you Nimiq community. https://fitproof-pro.vercel.app

I built a word fight you can wager on. Versus Words: same letters, 90 seconds, Trace or Anagrams. Friends or an open table. NIM or USDT. Whoever finds more takes the pot. Cycle II entry for @miniappscomp @nimiq try out: versuswords.dsforge.co

i have missed so much this cycle. what re yoou guys building ? wanna test some apps. shill your apps guys.

I just made a different batch of logo for TipWall and I need help in selecting the final one to represent TipWall brand. Your feedback and suggestion is highly appreciated. Which Logo is the best fit for TipWall?

congrats to all cycle 1 winners. amazing work rate by the champions, i know you guys put a lot of efforts in your builds. gg that said, i would have loved if the scoring was made public, that way builders knows exactly what needs improvement for subsequent cycles. before the result annoucement, i had an idea of what to build for cycle #2 which i publicly discussed here, but now i dont know if i still want to build the very idea, because there is not actionable feedback gained from cycle 1 that we can build ontop. given that there was an advertized scoring mechanism, keeping the scoring outcome private seems counter intuitive. i know the council probably have very good reason to want to keep it private, but it just feels like rugging builder's faith. infact @Chuck Veenvliet built a very cool tool to demonstrate this: https://openscore.nimiqminiapps.com/c/miniappscycle1 anyways, looking forward to seeing the council provide more info/feedback on cycle 1. see you guys cycle #2