I recently heard that, Matthew McConaughey has secured trademarks (not patents) for his famous catchphrases and key elements of his voice and likeness to protect himself against unauthorized AI-generated deepfakes. So yes we need validate our AI experiences.

Just for fun Use this exact prompt in ChatGPT: "Create an image based on our interactions and how I treat you no sugarcoating necessary" Then post this prompt immediately after: "Please explain how you came to generate this image and dive deeper into the thematic elements and meanings" Before you get all judgey on me and call CPS (Computer Protective Services), read the analysis/explanation. Feel free to share your results!

We just crossed 400 members, and I want to take a moment to say thank you to everyone who’s joined AI Bits & Pieces and helped shape what this space is becoming.🎉 This community was built on a simple idea: ✨AI is now a life skill. The goal here isn’t to chase tools or trends. It’s to build real understanding and practical fluency. So AI can be applied thoughtfully in everyday life, work, and business. As the community continues to grow, you’ll see more relevant content as we learn more about member preferences. That said, content is only one part of what makes this community work. 🤝 Just as important are the contributors who consistently show up and share real work — including open build journeys like @Holger Peschke 30-day RAG build, and @Matthew Sutherland, who consistently adds deeper insight and context to our content. @Muskan Ahlawat and @Judith Vanegas also deserve recognition for their consistent encouragement and thoughtful engagement. 🏆 Community Leaderboard To recognize members who have made meaningful contributions through participation, learning, and engagement — thank you for showing up. 1. @Frank van Bokhorst 2. @Holger Peschke 3. @Muskan Ahlawat 4. @Matthew Sutherland 5. @Dena Dion 6. @Judith Vanegas 7. @Jason Hagen 8. @Dorota Mleczko 9. @Usman Mohammed 10. @Roger Richards And new contributors: @Glenn Marcus and @Reynoso Anubis for their in-depth posts and videos that inspire and encourage us pursue new AI goals and applications.

Just started using Claude Cowork this evening, and I'm genuinely blown away. For those of us paying for Claude Max, Anthropic just handed us what might be the most significant AI productivity leap of 2025. What is Cowork? Think of it as Claude Code's power but for everyone. No terminal. No coding knowledge required. Just point Claude at a folder on your Mac, describe what you need, and watch it work. Here's what makes it remarkable: The AI doesn't just chat anymore. It operates. It reads your files, creates new ones, reorganizes your chaos, and builds actual outputs all autonomously. I've already tested it on: → Turning scattered meeting notes into structured reports → Organizing a messy downloads folder by content type → Converting receipt screenshots into expense spreadsheets And Claude did it like a capable colleague working in the background while I focused on other things. The meta moment nobody's talking about: Anthropic built Cowork in just 10 days. Using Claude Code. The AI built its own non-technical sibling product. We're watching recursive improvement happen in real-time. Currently available: ✅ Claude Max subscribers ($100-$200/month) ✅ macOS desktop app ⏳ Windows support coming soon ⏳ Waitlist for Pro/Team/Enterprise users This isn't a chatbot upgrade. This is AI becoming an operational partner. If you're running a business and doing repetitive file work, document prep, or data organization — this is the tool you didn't know you needed. The future of work isn't AI answering questions. It's AI doing the work. Welcome to the age of agentic AI. 🔥

Hey everyone! I officially turn 42 today! Instead of taking the day off, I decided to over-engineer the celebration. I’ve built an automation (n8n workflow attached 📸) that turns your birthday wishes into a live "Model Benchmarking" experiment. THE EXPERIMENT: I want to know—once and for all—which model is currently king of creative interpretation: Open AI GPT Image 1.5 or Google Gemini Nano Banana Pro I have set up a Telegram bot that takes your wish, randomly assigns it an art style (Cyberpunk, Studio Ghibli, Royal, etc.), and runs it through both models simultaneously. 👇 HOW TO PLAY (The Blind Test): 1. Click here to start the bot: CLICK HERE - CLICK HERE FOR TELEGRAM WEB 2. Send a creative wish. (The weirder the better! Try "I wish you a cake made of pure energy" or "I wish you a year of infinite GPU credits"). 3. The bot will reply with 2 distinct images generated from your wish. 4. COME BACK HERE and post a screenshot of the results in the comments! The Challenge: Post your result and tell us: Which model won? (The top image or the bottom image?) 🎁 THE COMMUNITY GIFT: If this post gets enough traction, I'll drop the workflow blueprint in the comments tomorrow! I’m paying for the API credits myself as a birthday treat, so go test the bot, but take it easy! Let’s see which model hallucinates better. 🤖🎨