Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Tahir

Lead Incubator

171 members • Free

Learn how to replace your 9–5 income with a lead generation business that gives you more time, freedom and flexibility.

Memberships

🌴 Unemployed Abroad 🌴

248 members • Free

Wealth University

3.3k members • Free

Elite 1% Freelancing Network

1.5k members • Free

Global Digital Nomads

4.6k members • Free

Lead Generation

4.5k members • Free

Subscribr

1.8k members • Free

Imperium Academy™

65.8k members • Free

Pay Per Call Academy

1.5k members • Free

8 contributions to Lead Gen Secrets 🤫
Leads per campaign
Guys, I found myself reflecting if I do the right thing. I did 20 searches on Leadswift for private chauffeurs in the big cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco in California, then I remove doubles, than I remove the leads without an email, then I get AI to tell me if they are a good fit or not... All of that got me 89 leads suitable for my offer of Google reviews. From 1521 on the original CSV file (btw, Leadswift doesn't allow to export by campaign, so I sort it myself in Excel). Is this normal? That seems way too much reduction in comparison to what I should get Also, do you have recommendations for scrapping Google Maps? Leadswift is clunky and just weird to use
2 likes • 4d
Honestly, going from 1,521 records down to 89 doesn't automatically sound wrong to me. It depends on how strict your filtering is. You're removing: - Duplicates - Businesses without emails - Businesses outside your ICP - Businesses AI thinks aren't a good fit If your offer is specifically for private chauffeurs and you're only targeting businesses that meet certain criteria, I'd rather have 89 highly relevant prospects than 1,500 random businesses. That said, I'd be careful about letting AI filter too aggressively. Sometimes it's better to cast a slightly wider net and let the market tell you who's interested. One thing I'd ask is whether 89 prospects is enough TAM. If you're sending cold email, I'd generally want a few hundred prospects at minimum before I start worrying about optimization. As for Google Maps scraping, I've had good experiences with tools like Apollo for B2B data and Google Maps scrapers that pull directly from Maps results. The bigger challenge usually isn't finding businesses—it's finding good contact information and verifying it.
0 likes • 3d
@William Auger Let me know if you need any help
Cold Emailers: Looking Back, What Was The Hardest Part?
I'm curious to hear from people who have already landed clients through cold email. Looking back, what was the hardest part when you were getting started? Was it: 📧 Sending the first emails? 📋 Building lead lists? ✍️ Writing copy? 📞 Taking sales calls? 😬 Handling rejection? ⚙️ Setting up the infrastructure? Or was it something completely different? For me, one of the hardest parts was building a list that was actually big enough, verified, and qualified. It was easy to find businesses. It was much harder to find the right businesses. I spent a lot of time cleaning lists, removing duplicates, verifying emails, filtering out bad-fit prospects, and trying to make sure I was reaching people who could actually buy. Looking back, I probably underestimated how important list quality was. And if you could go back to day one, what would you do differently? What would you spend less time on? What would you spend more time on? I've noticed a lot of beginners (myself included at times) spend weeks researching tools, building systems, setting up domains, tweaking websites, and trying to make everything perfect before they've even had a real conversation with a prospect. I'm interested to know what lessons you've learned from actually doing the work. What mistakes would you tell a beginner to avoid? And what advice would you give someone trying to land their first client today? 👇 Would love to hear from both beginners and people who have already signed clients.
Intro
Hello everyone, great to connect with you all! I am a Canadian based in China and my agency helps Chinese manufacturers connect with B2B partners globally.
1 like • 4d
Welcome 💪
Stop tweaking. Your stats haven't matured yet.
One of the most common cold email mistakes I see: Pulling the plug on a campaign at 48 hours because the numbers look flat. Here's the problem. Email stats don't mature that fast. Open rates, reply rates, and bounce data take time to stabilize, sometimes 5-7 days depending on your send volume and how your list is distributed across timezones. When you rewrite your copy at the 48-hour mark, you're making a decision based on noise, not signal. Then when things improve, you credit the new copy. But you probably just needed to wait. Give your campaigns at least a week before making any changes. Judge on reply rate and positive reply rate, not opens. And resist the urge to optimize in real time. The campaigns that work are usually the ones you left alone long enough to get real data.
0 likes • 4d
I think this is a great point, and it applies to more than just cold email. I see the same thing with Meta ads. People launch a campaign, look at the numbers after 24–48 hours, panic, and start changing everything before they've collected enough data to make a sensible decision. Sometimes the hardest part isn't optimization—it's having the patience to let the campaign run long enough to tell you what's actually happening. Most beginners either quit too early or start changing too many variables at once. Then they have no idea what actually caused the result.
Even My Cold Emails Fail at First 💀
I used to think a well-built cold email campaign should work right out of the gate. It doesn't. None of them do. Not even the ones I build for my own business. Hardly ever dialed in on the first launch. And I've been doing this for years. So here's what actually happens. You go through a program, you learn enough to get something live, you hit send, and... it doesn't immediately convert. Reply rates are low. No meetings booked. Feels like it's broken. 95% of people quit at that point and call it a failure. But that's not failure. That's just the launch. The optimization phase, the actual tweaking, is where the system becomes valuable. Different subject lines. Different angles. Different lead lists, sending volumes, follow-up sequences. Most people never get there. And here's the wild part: the system works. Cold email works. It just doesn't work on day one for anyone. The people who win are the ones who grind through the first few rounds of iteration and keep going until the numbers start moving. We don't stop until it actually works. That's the whole thing. If you're in week two with no results, you're not doing it wrong. You're just not done. Keep going, brother.
1 like • 4d
This is something I wish more beginners understood. A lot of people launch a campaign, don't get replies after a few days, and immediately assume cold email doesn't work. In reality, the first campaign is usually where you're collecting data. You're learning whether the problem is the list, the offer, the copy, the targeting, or something else entirely. I think people underestimate how much iteration goes into getting a campaign dialled in. The goal isn't to be perfect on day one. The goal is to get feedback from the market and improve from there. Most people quit before they've collected enough data to make an informed decision.
1-8 of 8
Tahir Miah
2
11points to level up
@tahir-miah-9669
Hey, I’m Tahir. I help ambitious professionals escape the 9–5 by building simple, profitable lead generation systems.

Active 1h ago
Joined May 25, 2026
INTJ
Powered by