@Tiffany Monroe

@Gemma Coles

@Ron Medlin dude, you're crushing it 🔥(was just looking at your communities), looks like you got it dialed in.

@Alyssa Vasquez I see. What type of content are you feeding your community and how often? And when you reach out to your members are they receptive to taking the conversations further into a call?

Are you using a training app? Apps like true coach, everfit, bridge have some form of habit tracker integrated. Not too sure if there's a plugin for skool on this one...

@Drew Taddia Have you played around with this just yet? If so, how are you liking it?

@Drew Taddia yeah; I actually reached out to Garrett, he's a solid dude; I think i'm going to look into integrating this. Also I have zapier and with skoot you can just run it all through there, which is a huge plus.

@Greg Chambers I like where your head's at, and this is definitely a rabbit hole I want to go down on with you. 1. I understand where you're coming from with the book analogy, which is great to sort of compare side-to-side on. Having said that, I think the benefit of utilizing something like a GPT in conjunction whilst writing a book is that the GPT can organize and synthesize the hodgepodge of ideas in my mind as I speak them out, whereas if I did this on my own, that would probably tack on another week or months because maybe I get burnt out or overwhelmed or don't know how to organize the information. And through iterations and iterations could essentially lead to fatigue, making me unmotivated to want to work on this subject matter. Where the GPT can do this in a matter of, I would like to think, less than 10 iterations if all the information is there. The other piece to this, and something I was touching upon, is the specificity and approximation with something very uniquely niched. That is something like a product or service that requires the human touch as an endpoint and validation to ensure the technological error or things that a GPT may miss. 2. I'm fairly confident that someone such as Tony Robbins, Alex Hermosie, or even Gandhi would not be overlooked if there were an opportunity to spend one-on-one time with them, let alone in a group environment. Therefore, a GPT version of this, while I'm sure would spark a good chunk of the pie, there are personalities who still value the human component of information synthesis. This is the whole idea and concept of collaboration where we can maybe collaborate through technology or through different perspectives (which are derived from the human mind). The end point, again as I mentioned earlier, will be human - at least for the foreseeable future. I agree with you that there will be a plethora of options and selections at our disposal in an attempt to make things more convenient. Sort of seems like a concept of market share and accessibility.

@Michelle G. thank you for your perspective and insights. This is exactly what I was alluding to in my presentation. Your point on the biopsychosocial factors that humans bring to learning is something I question AI will ever fully capture. The Turing test is essentially what we've come down to, where AI can get close enough to pass, but what I'm getting at is that "close enough" still isn't the same as the real thing. The nuance of being human, being present, adapting in the moment to a learner's needs, that's where coaches and educators remain irreplaceable.