@Jordan Wiseman does outscraper also gives out detailers businesses name as well.?

@Grzegorz S Thank you

@Danny Fisher You’re asking the right kind of question that most people overlook until they’ve already torched a domain and have no clue why. Here’s the thing, Yes, subdomains are 100% usable and often advisable but only when they’re part of a larger reputation management strategy. What most miss is this Subdomains don’t magically protect your root domain. They’re connected especially in the eyes of advanced spam filters (like Microsoft’s). So if your subdomain sends sketchy, low-engagement traffic, your main domain can still suffer downstream consequences. That’s why the setup matters way more than just DNS records. If you’re going to use a subdomain for cold or bulk outreach, here’s what I’ve found works best. Strategic Setup @ Choose a subdomain like mail.brand.com or hello.brand.com keep it clean and trustable. @ Set SPF, DKIM, DMARC (not just pass aim for strict policies) @ Run your domain through GlockApps or Mail-Tester before and after warmup @ Use Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI) if you want to boost trust (and it looks pro) Warmup + Reputation @ Even if you're technically confident, warm up slowly think of it like building domain credit. @ Send high engagement content first emails that get replies, not just opens @ Monitor deliverability across providers Gmail ≠ Outlook ≠ Yahoo Root Domain Risk (Real Talk) @ Subdomains don’t fully isolate your reputation they just segment it @ If you send low-quality, high-volume emails from a subdomain and start hitting spam traps or complaint thresholds, your entire domain can take a hit @ This is especially true if you use shared infrastructure (like Mailgun or SendGrid without a dedicated IP) Final Thought. What you’re really managing is reputation architecture not just email setup.Domains, subdomains, IPs, content, list hygiene, it all works together. So yes, subdomains are powerful but only if treated with the same respect you’d give your primary.

@Willem Greeff You're clearly putting in the work, and you’ve got the structure almost there but here’s the tough truth You’re asking for permission to be valuable instead of being valuable upfront. That opening is polished, but it reads like a polite handshake at a networking event not like someone who sees a bleeding neck problem and knows how to stop it. Here’s where the replies die. @ You’re leading with flattery + vague questions @ You’re pitching a concept (Authority Engine) without making them feel the pain that would make them want it @ Just reply Authority feels like a webinar opt-in, not a convo. here is the reframe option. Subject: You’re likely missing 30%+ of revenue (and it’s not your fault) {{FirstName}}, most service businesses I talk to are great at what they do but they’re invisible to the 90% of prospects who never fill out a form or hit Book Call. If your brand is relying on outbound or paid ads to drive visibility, you’re likely burning budget on people who don’t trust you yet. I’ve built something called the Authority Engine and it’s not a funnel, hack, or content calendar. It’s a positioning system that quietly makes you the obvious choice before you pitch. Happy to show you what it looks like just reply Yes and I’ll send over a breakdown (no pitch, just real strategy). What changed? @ Leads with a revenue blindspot @ Identifies the root pain — invisibility @ Pitches a solution to that pain, not just a shiny tool @ Call-to-action is light but clear @ Try leaning harder into pain --> gap --> authority --> easy yes.

@Danny Fisher Let me just paste my previous response here so you can see how it works. on the surface it does sound like classic database reactivation. But what I run is a different beast entirely. Most people think reactivation means blasting a list with a “We’re back” or “Here’s a discount” email and hoping for the best. What I do is far more strategic and psychologically dialed-in. Here’s what actually goes on behind the scenes. @ Buyer psychology sequencing I craft messages that aren’t just informational they’re emotionally layered. We tap into regret, nostalgia, status, urgency depending on the market. @ Segment-based positioning Not everyone in a list should hear the same message. I map out segments (past buyers, fence-sitters, ghosts) and match the offer flow accordingly. @ Pre-frame + micro-offers Before any pitch is made, I set the mental stage. The reader feels like this offer was built just for them, because in many ways, it is. @ Revenue stacking This isn’t just about one-time sales. I engineer sequences that revive the list AND turn it into a warm pool for upsells, referrals, and long-term conversions. So yeah, it looks like reactivation. But what I deliver is a profit system disguised as a few emails. Appreciate you sparking the convo I love peeling back the curtain on this stuff.

@Danny Fisher yes, at face value, it can be an old list that hasn’t heard from the business in a while, But “revival” in my playbook goes deeper than just age or silence. It’s about reactivating desire, not just inbox activity. Here’s what I mean @ You could have a list that was emailed last month, But if that message didn’t land if it didn’t resonate, trigger, or convert then that audience is already asleep. @ Revival is about waking up the part of them that buys. Not just opening an email. Not just clicking a link. But emotionally re-engaging with the offer, the problem, and the transformation. That could mean - A list that’s gone cold over days months - A list that’s been “active,” but numb - A segment that never converted and just needs the right emotional angle So yes, sometimes it’s a neglected list. But often, it’s about re-sequencing the offer and framing it so powerfully that the same people suddenly say “Why didn’t I take action earlier?” That’s what makes it more than reactivation. It’s revival of interest, urgency, and buying intent.

I’m not at the point (yet) where I’ve automated full workflows or client systems with AI but watching Jay’s breakdown opened my eyes to how fast this game is evolving. The biggest shift for me was realizing:→ AI isn’t just a tool it’s an amplifier of intent and clarity. When you know what you want to build, these tools remove the bottlenecks. But if you’re fuzzy, they just give you more content and confusion. What hit me hardest from Jay’s video was the part about context and prompting. I used to think I was using ChatGPT but really, I was tossing random questions at it. Now I’m learning how to train it with frameworks, goals, and structure and the quality of output is night and day. My next goal is to create a simple AI-assisted cold outreach workflow nothing fancy, just something lean that runs without manual handholding.