What makes Moray's story unusual isn't just the claim itself; it's the sheer volume of people who watched the device operate. Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, Moray opened his demonstrations to engineers, scientists, government officials, and curious members of the public. These weren't quick parlor tricks either. Observers reported watching the device run for extended periods, powering light bulbs and small motors while connected to nothing but an antenna and a ground wire. Several of the witnesses had technical backgrounds and knew what to look for. They checked for hidden wires. They asked Moray to move the device to new locations, away from any possible connection to the power grid. In some accounts, they had him set up in open fields where the nearest power line was miles away. The device still worked. The bulbs still lit. And the witnesses, many of whom came in skeptical, walked away without a satisfying conventional explanation for what they had seen. Moray was willing to let people watch the device run, but he drew a hard line at letting anyone examine the internals. He had his reasons. He feared patent theft, and more than that, he worried about governments seizing the technology for weapons applications. In his view, the only protection he had was secrecy, so the device remained a sealed wooden box. Observers could see what it did, but never how it did it. That tension between openness and secrecy defined every demonstration he ever gave. What stands out from a research perspective is how consistent the reports are across different observers and different years. People who saw the device in 1925 described essentially the same behavior as those who saw it in 1935. The apparatus required a warm-up period. Output varied depending on antenna placement and orientation. It could be interrupted and restarted. These suggest a real physical process that Moray could reproduce reliably, even if he couldn't fully explain it in terms the scientific establishment would accept. None of this proves the device worked the way Moray claimed, of course. Witness testimony, no matter how plentiful, isn't a substitute for controlled measurement and peer review. But it does raise a legitimate question: if this was fraud, it was an extraordinarily elaborate and sustained one. And if it was self-deception, it fooled a lot of trained eyes over a very long time.

By the 1930s, Moray had spent more than a decade demonstrating his device to anyone willing to watch. The scientific establishment, however, was not watching with an open mind. The core problem was thermodynamics. Moray claimed his device produced usable electrical power from the ambient environment, with no conventional fuel source and no meaningful input. To a physicist, that framing ran directly into the conservation of energy, one of the most rigorously tested principles in all of science. Energy cannot simply appear. It has to come from somewhere. And if Moray couldn't point to where, then as far as the establishment was concerned, the conversation was over before it started. The secrecy that had once protected his work now became the thing that buried it. Peer review depends on other scientists being able to examine, measure, and reproduce a claim. Moray's refusal to open the box, however understandable his reasons, meant none of that was possible. No independent lab ever replicated his results. No journal published his work. No university ran a controlled test. From the outside, his device looked indistinguishable from any other perpetual motion claim, and the scientific community had long since learned to dismiss those on sight. Over time, the default assumptions hardened into one of four conventional explanations: a hidden radioactive power source, elaborate fraud, sincere self-deception, or a concealed conventional battery somewhere in the apparatus. Then in 1939, the device was destroyed, and the Swedish Stone was lost with it. Accounts of exactly what happened vary, but the outcome was the same. The one piece of physical evidence that could have settled the question was gone. Moray spent the rest of his life trying to rebuild what he had, but he never managed to recreate the original performance. Without the stone, without the schematics, without any surviving hardware for later researchers to examine, the entire body of work collapsed into anecdote. The witnesses aged and passed on. The patents sat on shelves. The story became a footnote in the history of fringe science.

I have been researching T. Henry Moray for a couple of years now and his story is a fascinating one. He developed one of the most expert observed "free energy" device to date and I have been working over the last year+ to figure out how he was able to produce usable electricity and create a modern version, since almost all of his blueprints/schematics and prototypes were destroyed and he was very secretive with his ideas in order to prevent the Russian and American governments from co-opting his tech for destructive purposes. Over the next several posts I will go into his past and share his bio, what we know of his device and recorded witness testimony, and the work I have put into reframing his ideas through the lens of modern semiconductor and plasma physics. Below is his early years bio and the start of Thomas Henry Moray's journey. In 1892, Thomas Henry Moray was born in Salt Lake City, Utah. He grew up with a natural pull toward electrical engineering and eventually pursued formal education in the field. But the pivotal chapter of his story began overseas. As a young man, Moray traveled to Sweden on a Mormon mission, and it was there that he allegedly discovered a peculiar mineral specimen that would come to be known as the "Swedish Stone." Moray believed this stone held extraordinary electrical properties, and when he returned home, he spent years incorporating it into a device he claimed could pull usable electrical power from the environment. What he eventually built was a roughly 60-pound apparatus housed in a wooden box, connected to an antenna and a ground. He called his core components "Moray valves," hand-built elements containing the Swedish Stone and other semiconductor-type materials that he kept deliberately secret. By the 1920s, Moray was demonstrating this device publicly, claiming it could light banks of bulbs and run motors with no conventional power source. He wasn't doing this quietly, either. Over the span of roughly 10 to 15 years, Moray conducted demonstrations for a wide range of observers, including engineers and government officials. He invited skeptics. He ran the device in remote locations away from power lines. The wooden box, the antenna, the glowing bulbs; dozens of people saw it with their own eyes. Whatever was happening inside that box, Moray was clearly not afraid to show it off.

Here is short summary of this experiment: The cones are activated with DC input and just a single component (Transistor) without a resistor at all on the slayer circuit. When Im using Transistor 2SD718 which is BJT NPN type the input power was 12 Wats and the LED on the output was the same brightness. When using Sic(Silicon Carbite) MOSFET the LED are the same brightness or more but the input power degrees to 4.5Watts this is almost 3 times lees input power while the output remain the same or even higher. The feedback loop wire from the cones provide both, the voltage for MOSFET Gate and the Timing that the cones love to operate, its a shelf tuning circuit. This create magnetic and resonant coupling similar to a Tesla Transformer but the secondary are the cones (Short Circuited Mobvios Loop). By shifting the Capacitive reactance of the system with my hand the impedance of the structure is dropping significantly and this makes the cones much more thurste drowning the maximum 5 ampers of current that the power supply can handle. This makes the LED much brighter and eventually shutting down and the phone stoping recording because the fields interfere. Nex I need to measure the output power with high frequency current probe and make a proper and precise Flash Matrix circuit inside with a Quartz crystal at the center. So far this is very promising results and would be great to experiment with local university and see how we can take the project just one more step forward.

This is longer audio excerpt from the secon or third private session with Bashar. He give the general measurments and confirm that this is exactly what Nicola Tesla was thinking to do with the Wardenclyffe Tower. (notice hist intonation while he is doing that). The Wardenclyffe Tower is 57 meters tall and Bashar explained that 10-11 meters are actuall enough. In the last sessions he said N.Tesla now know from spirit that the initial scale he invision can bu much smaller.