@Colton Jackson

@Harvey Raybould @Ruben Plasmeijer @Alexey Inyushin @Ryan Akiyama I haven't had a chance to see you yet, would you be interested in doing a joint meetup this weekend? It's a casual style hangout, discussing and comparing what we do in our communities and what works for us 😊

@Harvey Raybould I went through the whole challenge, and I thing it's good. I like that it's very simple and clear, without overcomplications. One problem - right now it's neither challenge nor course. I don't think that people will go through it by themselves for 7 days. You should either do it as a challenge and post it yourself everyday for 7 days, or make it more like a course. But overall, if we talk about courses, my reservations: 1. People won't consume value like that if it's free. 2. Overall I don't think courses are very actionable. Meaning, people won't use that theory to its full potential. In order for them to really apply the theory, I believe consultations such as 1:1 or cohorts, or group workshops work much better. That's my opinion.

@Harvey Raybould I think it's a trade-off between those tings. If you leave it like this, I don't think many people will go through it. If you want it to bring value to people then you'd have to put in some of your own time. And I agree, it's not really worth it to do that for a free course. Especially considering that people see free value as a hassle. So why try hard if they don't even want it? If we're talking about this as a challenge, you could spread it out. Make it 7 week challenge, or 3.5 weeks. Would probably need to see what people want - or don't want 😄

@Harvey Raybould Pro Tip: Don't put 'passion' in the gif search 😂

@Harvey Raybould

@Jessica Guillory Thank you, added! 🙌

@Angela Perry Thank you - added 🥳

@Angela Perry @Jessica Guillory Angela thank you for the kind words, and Jessica I'm happy you enjoy it here 😄🙏

@Jessica Guillory Very happy to hear that and to have a community like that ⭐