Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Ai Filmmaking

7.6k members • $5/month

Adrian Viral AI Marketing

1.3k members • $50/m

WavyWorld

46.6k members • Free

The RoboNuggets Network (free)

34.7k members • Free

Ai Film Academy™

1.1k members • $19/month

AIography: The Pro AI Film Lab

828 members • Free

16 contributions to AIography: The Pro AI Film Lab
This week in AI filmmaking… things escalated.
A digital “Tillyverse” for AI actors is coming. The WGA West canceled its awards ceremony over a staff strike. Luma dropped Ray 3.14 and put $1M on the table at Cannes. And fresh data from 120,000+ AI-generated videos shows just how mainstream this has become. What’s fascinating isn’t just the tech getting better (it is). It’s that acceleration and resistance are happening at the same time. On one side: synthetic talent ecosystems, production-ready video engines, vertical video dominance, global adoption. On the other: labor unrest, anti-AI film festivals backed by Oscar winners, and guild tensions playing out in public. We’re not watching a trend. We’re watching the industry reorganize itself. I break all of this down in today’s AIography—including what actually matters for filmmakers trying to build careers right now (not just argue on Twitter). If you’re not subscribed yet, it’s free and takes about 7 minutes to read. 👉 Click HERE to subscribe. And as always—I'm curious: Are we heading toward two parallel Hollywoods? Or does this all eventually merge? Let’s discuss.
1 like • 4d
Random Thoughts: - I partially agree with @Alex Vachon that we're splitting aesthetics, but in the near-term, we're also going to wind up with two parallel industries, much like how there's Hollywood, and there's YouTube. Eventually, we'll see crossover, like there is with TV/Film, but there will be a lingering stigma for a while. - No doubt about it, AI is going to play a major role in Hollywood. Films are just too expensive to not use AI for VFX and other administrative tasks, though I hope we keep humans in the loop as much as possible. - As for the "Tillyverse," that's going nowhere in Hollywood, though "she" could find a home and be quite successful on YouTube and maybe with some advertisers. It all depends on how good a performance they can get out of "her" and how good the stories are. Ultimately, no one outside of Hollywood is going to care. Yes, they just want to be entertained. - But also in the short-term, depending on how you use AI, you might get blacklisted, and that's a real fear. I've asked a few young actors if they'd want to perform in productions I'm planning (some would act on-screen, others would be doing the equivalent of motion-capture performances), and while some are interested, they're all afraid of not just getting blacklisted, but losing their friends as well. - And this applies to writing. I've used AI for research and some limited brainstorming, but NOT for writing. But because I'm interested in AI, I've lost a lot of writer friends and even received death threats (yes! It's been dealt with).
Adobe Just Built an AI That Does Your First Cut
Here's Why I'm Not Worried. Adobe just dropped a new Firefly feature called "Quick Cut." You upload raw footage, type a description of what the video should be—interview, product demo, travel vlog—and it automatically produces a rough cut. Let that sink in for a second. AI is now assembling edits from raw footage based on a text prompt. It pulls from Adobe, Google, OpenAI, and Runway models. It targets product reviewers, podcasters, marketers—anyone who needs a fast edit without hiring an editor. I can already hear the panic. "They're coming for our jobs." No. They're not. Here's why. A rough cut is not an edit. Every editor in this community knows the difference. A rough cut is assembly. It's organization. It's the starting point. The CRAFT of editing—pacing, rhythm, emotional timing, knowing what to cut and what to keep, building tension, finding the story inside the footage—that's what happens AFTER the rough cut. Quick Cut is doing the part of the job that was already the least creative. It's pulling selects and assembling them in order. That's assistant editor work at best—and even assistants bring more judgment to it than an algorithm. This is actually good news for editors. Here's why: When the rough assembly takes 5 minutes instead of 5 hours, you get to spend more time on the part that actually matters—the storytelling. The craft. The decisions. This is exactly what I mean when I say everything becomes post. AI is collapsing the mechanical parts of the pipeline so humans can focus on the creative parts. The question isn't whether AI can assemble footage. It can. The question is: who decides if the assembly is any good? That's you. That's always been you. What do you think? Are tools like this a threat or an opportunity? Drop your take below.
1 like • 9d
I've seen some examples of AIs making selects from interviews, but not from dailies following an actual script. Are they doing that now? Because if they are, I hope there's an easy way to do something like Frame Match where it will call up each take if the one it selects doesn't work and allow you to replace it.
🚨 Today's Coffee Hour Recap🚨
Had a great conversation today with a working editor and a creative professional from Chile about where AI filmmaking is headed and how to adapt. This is exactly what I built AIography for — real people, real questions, real talk. We're making this a weekly thing. Same time, every week. Come with your questions, your projects, whatever's on your mind. I'm here for you. If you want the deep stuff — the courses, the workflows, the skills you're going to NEED to thrive as a creative in the AI economy — that's in the Founding Members tier. Go to the classroom and click the link. At the price being offered right now, it'll be worth its weight in gold. This rate won't last. We're building the future of filmmaking right here. Come be part of it. — Larry
1 like • 11d
I literally just got this email (3:13PM EST). Don't know how long ago it was posted. Where's the Live Chat?? Hey @Ed Kulzer !!
1 like • 10d
@Lawrence Jordan Is there a standing link?
AIography: The Future of Filmmaking Is Here (Free PowerPoint Deck)
I've been working on something I'm excited to share with this community. This deck lays out what I believe is happening right now: we're not just seeing AI added to filmmaking. We're watching the birth of an entirely new medium. I'm calling it AIography. Film was celluloid. Video was tape. Digital was sensors. AIography is generation. Same creative DNA -- completely different process. The deck covers: - Why "AI filmmaking" is actually a misnomer -- and what AIography really is - The three forces that made this moment inevitable - The new toolkit: Runway, Veo 3, Sora 2, Kling, Luma, Seedance, and more - Why editors and post-production professionals are about to become the most valuable people in the room (hint: everything becomes post) - How traditional film and AIography will coexist, not compete - A preview of my upcoming book (It'll be a while... but) - AIography: The Complete Guide to AI Filmmaking and Content Creation - A first look at Lumarka my "Script to Clip" AI filmmaking application This isn't about replacing anyone. It's about what becomes possible when the tools of Hollywood are in everyone's hands. Download the deck and let me know what you think. I want to hear from this community: Want more stuff like this? Join the Founding Members tier. What's the first project you'd tackle if budget and crew size were no longer barriers? Let's create art. -- Larry
1 like • 13d
Good presentation, but a couple of thoughts: - In The New Normal, you should include Casting/Character Concepting and Set Design. While those can be part of Storyboarding, I think filmmakers will get better overall results working these out before going into Storyboards. It will help the filmmaker think things through. - While you discuss it in The New Toolkit for Creators, you need to really hammer home the Concept that AI is a TOOL in the filmmaking process. A powerful tool, indeed, but still just a tool. Then go into the examples of what AIs can be used during which phase of a project. I say this because it plants the concept firmly in their mind and create the conceptual framing that includes all AIs and that’s needed to lock it in, then go into the examples. A lot of people think that the intent of AI is to do everything. Once they internalize that It’s just another tool, they’ll be more open to using it. - Finally, and this is just me, but the black BG is kind of foreboding, and that with the light text kills my eyes.
0 likes • 12d
@Lawrence Jordan Happy to help.
🔥 New AIography Newsletter just dropped — and this week is WILD!
Let me give you the highlights: An AI-generated Tom Cruise vs. Brad Pitt fight scene made with Seedance 2.0 went so viral that the MPA — the organization that represents every major Hollywood studio — issued a formal statement calling it "massive infringement." This is the first time a text-to-video clip has triggered an industry-wide legal response. We are officially in new territory. But here's what I want you paying attention to: Kling 3.0's Multishot feature. This is the one that matters for anyone actually trying to MAKE something. Character consistency across multiple shots has been our biggest headache — and Kling just took a real swing at solving it. I break down the side-by-side comparisons in the newsletter. Also in this issue: → xAI launched Grok Imagine 1.0 (more competition = better tools for us) → Gore Verbinski made an anti-AI movie sitting at 89% on Rotten Tomatoes → The r/aivideo Awards hit 54,000 submissions — March 15 in Vegas That last one should be on your radar. This community is doing work that belongs on that stage. Go read the full issue and let me know in the comments — which story caught your eye? https://aiography.beehiiv.com/p/it-s-likely-over-for-us And if you're not already subscribed. DO IT TODAY!
🔥 New AIography Newsletter just dropped — and this week is WILD!
1 like • 19d
I think we're at the first of what will be multiple inflection points. The panic over Seedance 2.0 is understandable, but also a knee-jerk reaction. Regardless of what anyone thinks about AI, it's here to stay and will be incorporated into most workflows. While I want to keep humans in the loop as much as possible and pay artists their fair share of training LLMs, the reactionary blowback from Seedance 2.0 could also hurt free speech. From what I understand (and I could be wrong), the model wasn't trained on Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt, but is so advanced that all the user had to do was upload images of both actors to utilize them. Also, several of the examples I've seen are clearly parody which should be protected speech, but someone argued that the works weren't transformative enough to qualify for protection. Honestly, I'm on the fence about so much of it. I want to be able to make the next Star Wars by myself, but I also don't want to be accused of stealing from others. After all, both Pablo Picasso and Quintin Tarentino both said something to the effect of, "Good artists copy. Great artists steal".
1 like • 17d
@Lawrence Jordan I agree, especially that "the people who adapted thrived, and the people who dug in their heels got left behind." I've seen it so many times, and it's sad. Don't get me wrong. I totally get their fear, especially the writers who've been getting squeezed forever and who (mostly) are NOT into technology, but it also goes to being open-minded. In the meantime, I'm working hard to learn the tech and to develop my editing skills so I can do as much of the work as possible (or, until I can afford to hire people 😉). I'm hoping "Hollywood," the AI Bros, and society as a whole will figure out how to use this technology fairly and ethically before we ruin it for everyone.
1-10 of 16
Neal Wiser
3
39points to level up
@neal-wiser-8461
Screenwriter: Scriptapalooza Fellow (2020), ISA Dev Slate. Won/Placed in 12 comps. I sometimes teach Screenwriting at Drexel U. Pivoting to Editor.

Active 11h ago
Joined May 20, 2025
Philadelphia
Powered by