Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI Money Lab

53.9k members • Free

Records Information Management

133 members • Free

13 contributions to Records Information Management
Scenario: Retention vs “Just in Case”
A business unit wants to retain records well beyond the approved retention period “just in case they might be useful later”. There is no legal hold and no documented business justification. What would you do? - Enforce disposal strictly? - Allow an exception? - Ask for justification and document the decision? - Escalate the risk? Explain your reasoning, not just your decision.
0 likes • 10h
@Lebohang Mokoena I really appreciate and resonate with what you said🙌. I’ve been thinking about the ‘just-in-case’ approach, it can be quite counterproductive, often leading to indecisive actions driven by emotions, especially since people can become personally attached to records. I’m wondering if we have any policies or legal measures for organisations/departments/individuals who retain records beyond their prescribed retention periods. @Paul Mullon and @Lebohang Mokoena do we currently have any mechanisms in our industry that address this?
0 likes • 6h
@Paul Mullon Indeed, that is unfortunate. Thank you, I always appreciate your insight. 🙌🙌🙌
A small RIM habit that pays off
Good records management is often built on small, repeatable habits rather than large initiatives. One useful habit is pausing to ask: “Is this information still needed, and for what purpose?” This question supports better retention decisions and reduces unnecessary accumulation over time. Reflection questions: - Where does information tend to accumulate “just in case”? - What makes disposal feel risky in your organisation? Action: Identify one area where disposal could happen more confidently.
1 like • 6h
@Paul Mullon What makes disposal feel risky in your organisation? For me, disposal starts to feel risky when it becomes reactive rather than intentional. Especially when a department suddenly rushes to dispose of records because an inspection or audit is coming up. That kind of pressure-driven clean-up doesn’t feel strategic, it feels exposed. As Paul mentioned, the small but powerful habit of continuously asking, “Is this information still needed, and for what purpose?” should be part of our everyday records culture, not something we remember only when auditors are at the door. So to me when it’s rushed, it feels uncertain, and that uncertainty is what makes disposal feel risky.
From Policy to Defensible Practice
Strong records management is not about having perfect policies. It is about being able to explain and defend decisions when challenged. Experienced practitioners focus on clarity, proportionality, and documentation. They accept trade-offs and prioritise effort where risk is highest. Reflection questions: 1. Which records decision would be hardest to defend today? 2. What evidence would support that decision? Action: Identify one decision that would benefit from clearer documentation.
0 likes • 7h
@Paul Mullon at this point, I don’t think there is any, not because my records are in perfect order and don’t need defending, but perhaps it’s there and I’m just overlooking it, and it might surface at a very critical and not ideal time🤧. @Paul Mullon I’m curious, from your perspective, which records decision do you think would be hardest to defend today?
Managing Records in Legacy Systems
Legacy systems often hold large volumes of high-risk records with limited governance controls and poor visibility. Decisions to migrate, decommission, or maintain these systems are rarely straightforward. Governance should guide decisions about legacy systems — not convenience, cost alone, or organisational inertia. Reflection questions: - Do you have legacy systems holding critical or regulated records? - Is there a clear plan for managing or retiring those systems? Action: List one legacy system and the key records-related risks it presents.
0 likes • 7h
@Douglas Maina Hmmmmmmmm interesting🤔, I also had a friend who experienced this at one of our universities. They’ve unfortunately lost a significant number of student records from their earlier years because the systems they used became obsolete, and effortless migration wasn’t one of the criteria when the system was chosen.
0 likes • 7h
@Paul Mullon Just a curious question: what exactly is a legacy system, and under what circumstances is a system considered a legacy system?
Training: The missing link in RIM
Training is essential to embedding records management practices. Even the best frameworks fail without awareness and understanding. Training should be practical and role specific. 1. How often do staff receive RIM training? 2. Is it tailored to their roles? Action: Identify one group that would benefit from targeted RIM training.
2 likes • 7d
@Douglas Maina yes, and refresher training needs be done on a basis applicable to the organisation.🙌
0 likes • 10h
@Hlabelani Baloyi you are right😇, and this is actually where awareness of Records Management becomes essential. Even small organisations need to understand that their objectives and overall existence can be strengthened and sustained through proper records and information management, and it will cost them more in the long run if they don't allocate resources at the early stages.
1-10 of 13
Mbava Muhongo
3
42points to level up
@mbava-muhongo-4928
Specializing in RM Training | Project Management | Administration and Document Management

Active 3h ago
Joined Dec 18, 2025