Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

The RoboNuggets Network (free)

66.5k members • Free

Automatable Free

21.4k members • Free

AI Automation Vault

27.8k members • Free

Clief Notes

44.5k members • Free

AI Automation Society

437k members • Free

Story Hacker AI

1.7k members • $67/month

ChatGPT Users

12.8k members • Free

GC
Growthworks Community

24k members • Free

Ghostwriters Anonymous

17k members • Free

15 contributions to Clief Notes
📊 POLL 📊 What is your software development experience level?
I’ve never touched a line of code before AI. I’ve said it many times to a lot of you. It feels in this community like sometimes that makes me an outlier. I’m curious how many others out there are in a similar boat to me and how many span the spectrum. Drop your vote below and leave a comment! ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️
Poll
130 members have voted
1 like • 2d
The last time I “coded” was in basic and Pascal 40 years ago, so it has been a long time. I have an understanding of the fundamentals so I am quite dangerous(not always in a good way) with the assistance of ai.
Could a folder based project replace a database?
Is there a scenario where a folder based project could outperform a database?
Evidence, Source Heirarchies, Claim Strength
Hey guys, need some help. I am doing too much with this: 1) apply various source/evidence heirachies tags to various research inputs 2) figure out the best way to incorporate into research (.md) outputs for obsidian, perhaps using some type of metadata or tags in line with text...I still havent figured out the best solution 3) include it as an operating contact for my research pipeline without boggling down the operations and context There is lots of concepts i created with claude here, and worried its now too "overburdening" What types of contracts do you guys have for research type pipelines, where you want to document evidence, score its source, and assert claims from truths etc. Can someone give advise on how to slim it down to the minimal required operating model for this purpose? *See my current file attached: since I clearly had claude write this up, its a pain to read and review...feel free to parse it through your own LLM, and give suggestions/revision otherwise. Thanks for your time Fam!
1 like • 2d
I had a very extensive project dealing with allowable attorneys fees after an arbitration win. The situation covered six years of billing records (1000’s of billing entries and cost entries) that had to be reviewed in the context of 13 cases that control a panels’ basis to award fees and costs. My first run at it was to have md file with all 13 cases in it to review against the volumes of billing entires. It was a disaster blew tokens and couldn’t finish in token limits. I ended up making md files for each case and having an orchestrator have the billing records analyzed by multiple agents each solely focused on a specific case analysis applied to the billing records and cost records. This was done in parallel and then an interpreter analyzed the results for u pique and duplicate outcomes that each case analysis returned and merged the revised results for a drafterto provided me a detailed memorandum on why fees and costs were or were not allowable citing to the specific case that baked up that conclusion. The reason I bring this up after reviewing your md file is maybe you should think of breaking down the evidence reviews and source into more distinct components and making it easier for your project to digest and analyze. Just a thought, hope it helps.
0 likes • 2d
@Aaron Kruger not only the plot but also its mind. The forty page output was dead wrong on my first attempt. Took 11 iterations before I got a result that was 80% of where it needed to be. I kept a revising to smaller bites of the elephant and orchestrating reviews and drafting after each bite passed quality control review. The tokens I spent on this learn as you go project were insane, but was great learning experience.
🏁 Playbooks 3.2 Check-In
This one is foundational. The folder structure you build locally is what GitHub stores and serves. Get this right and Claude Code wastes zero tokens figuring out your project. 💬 Drop Your Answer in the Comments 1. Open your .gitignore file right now. How many lines are in it? Bonus: is there anything in there you don't recognize? 2. How long is your CLAUDE.md? The target is 30-50 lines. If you're over 100, what could you move into a folder-level README instead? 3. Have you ever accidentally pushed something that should have stayed local? No judgment. Share so others can learn from it. ✅ Action Step If you haven't done this yet: create a throwaway repo, upload any index.html file, turn on Pages, confirm you get a live URL. Three minutes. Do it before moving to Lesson 3.3. Post your GitHub Pages URL in the comments when it's live. Quick Gut Check Why does folder structure matter for Claude Code?
Poll
46 members have voted
0 likes • 2d
Still working on a revised site, lots of changes based upon this lesson
🏁 Playbooks 3.1 Check-In
You watched Jake build and deploy a full website in under 10 prompts. Let's see what stuck before you try it yourself. 💬 Drop Your Answer in the Comments 1. What's one thing you'd include in your first prompt that the video showed gets missed? (Logo format? Image direction? Color palette? Form handling?) 2. Which "Key Moment" timestamp are you rewatching before your first build? 3. If you've already built something: How many prompts did it take you? The video benchmark is under 10. If you hit 15+, what would you front-load next time? ✅ Action Step Post your live GitHub Pages URL in the comments when you finish. Include one sentence about what you'd change on the next iteration. Stuck on a deployment error? Screenshot it and post here before burning tokens. Someone else probably hit the same one. Quick Gut Check Where does the build actually start?
Poll
68 members have voted
0 likes • 2d
Great information, wish I had hit this lesson before using Claude design to develop a site.
1-10 of 15
Matthew Mazur
3
37 points to level up
@matthew-mazur-5170
I am a AI Novice. My other job is as an attorney. I am looking to build my skill set in AI to develop new businesses & improve my existing business.

Active 1d ago
Joined Jun 25, 2026
Florida
Powered by