Has anyone messed around with the copilot notebooks? It seems like this may be an option with the ICM framework; it just showed up on my copilot license with work enterprise account. Thanks

Two weekends ago, I had to run not one but two audits on the fly of my system. One because Opus 4.8 hallucinated and said something concerning and I wanted to trace the work. The other because a CloudKit error ate some of my files (in NotePlan) and I needed to be sure my governance was firing and it wasn’t AI gone rogue. In both cases, traceability that I had insisted on in the architecture - against the advice of the model - made the audits possible and comprehensive. (And reassuring. Except for the CloudKit issue which means I have a migration coming up because my provider isn’t as resilient as I require). The result of that - a feedback memory captured and enhanced to “preserve the margin” and the proof point of where items the system/model had seen as “bloat”, I had fought for. It saw the finding as so important it wrote and drafted a memory for my review without me asking for it - AI’s version of an epiphany. The core truth underlying that - I’ve seen things go wrong. I’ve been around, I’ve had plenty of unhappy path moments. I have been part of the rescue crew. I’m not unique in that - almost everyone here will have their professional and personal equivalents. Those experiences, I carry the scars of those. And each of those I have learnt from. Where the margin is worth it. Why this is a compromise that isn’t worth the cost. Where to hold the line. AI can give you the textbook theory. It has never been burned. It has never been battle tested. You have. Give it those scars in context in your ICM system and see what happens. It’s game changing.

I thought I’d be the last person to say this but, when will there be an in person meet up? I want to get yalls takes on things and hear more about this and tbh skool is great but hard to consume, imo. I want to deep dive topics and ask questions and in person is obviously way better. Throw in a market place component with companies etc. it’s a win win win. @Jake Van Clief yall got any plans for something like this?

Last night, before bed, I picked up my phone. Old habit. Check YouTube, X, Reddit. See what I missed. Hunt for the hidden gem someone posted about AI. I put it back down without opening any of them. Not because I was tired. Because I didn't want to. And when I thought about it, I realized I haven't actually done that routine in a while. For most of us, the answer to the title question is probably the same: "Stop Building AI Agents. Use This Folder System Instead." That was two months ago. It's why most of us are here. Everything I was hunting for out there, I have now in this community. The videos that came before that were all the same. Everyone was copying each other. New model, new skill, someone's hot take on what changes everything. I kept watching because I thought the next one would be useful. It wasn't. Curious if anyone else has had this happen - where the community replaced the hunting behavior that used to eat your nights. What did you stop or start doing once you found Clief Notes?

What patterns are working so far, and what new possibilities are on the horizon? I want to start pitching to leads on using folder structure as agent architecture. So far, I'm building with Codex and Claude from my desktop, but that doesn't scale beyond me and my computer. Before I can pitch, I need to develop a clear understanding of what's possible for creating ICM solutions without local-system dependencies. I think managing files in Google shared drive or Microsoft OneDrive could work, but I'm not sure what pitfalls would come up. I'm not sure if ChatGPT or Claude.ai have sufficient agentic capabilities to carry out all the tasks that an ICM workspace would ask them to do. Maybe ChatGPT Workspace Agents or Claude Managed Agents connecting to ICM files in cloud storage is the right answer.