Cool, checking it out :D Super upbeat and energizing!

Sounds epic. Next up on the listen list while building IRL this weekend :D

One nuance I hope to get from it is the line between "can't do more" vs "can't improve more".... quantity vs quality. Obvs theres always some way that anyone can improve on almost anything, but where's the line of diminishing returns at which finding your replacement becomes the best strategy. What are your thoughts @Lukas Schmidt ?

@Darin Berntson curious your experience of Circle? I've heard good about it too but haven't explored it. Por qué no bueno?

@Darin Berntson Hmm, thanks Darin. Sounds like lots of possibility but not streamlined for effective community engagement.

@Maximus Cavalic haha yeah, im sure I am, and feeling the need to explore this so I can be solid in my integrity with those I serve, otherwise I feel hollow and so will my container.

@The Warrior Shaman Amazing use of Loom there Bogdan, thanks for your thoughts here! Yes, the rules are in service to protect the community from other spammers, and as leader it makes sense to offer people in the community opportunities to further support their own goals relevant to their interest being there in the first place. Guess its just the semantics of the thing, to say one thing and do the opposite. To act entitled as the leader that the rules I set dont apply to me. but that is semantics if the intention is to protect the good of the group and serve the interests of the group... two sides of the same coin question is what energy am i bringing to it. and yes, any resistance to sales that i have within me certainly attaches to these semantics as an excuse and creates an internal obstacle to my goals. So, inner reflection and reframing to be done here for sure. thanks for taking the time to offer what you did.

That was incredible! I was late and locked out but kept trying to get back in and made it! So glad some people clearly had to cut out early to get to the turkey table...