Was wondering if anyone's been into an OpenClaw rabbit hole and seeing fruit from it recent. I've been working with a team of experts on answering this exact pain point (which would be my own Skool community) Otherwise would love to learn what's been working for you

I've been teaching at this private school for a little bit over 4 months. In that time, I've had a lot of interesting takeaways that I thought to share, and I hope that if you're working with anyone born after 2000, you'll walk away with at least one new perspective. 1) 80% of classrooms are GPT-dependent and hate it. I've heard this to be true about public schools too, but with private schools where kids are believed to have an extra "edge", they're just prompting their way through oblivion and hating it. They know it's not their own thoughts. Management frowns upon any AI use, teachers are scared of inaccuracy, and students lean into it to offload the difficulty of thinking through problems. I posted about this revelation on Reddit, expressing that I was hoping to offer some middle-ground solution. The aversion and pitchforks were palpable, I had DMs, comments, all walks of teachers saying that I embody "the problem" with "tech bros coming into a space they know nothing about and trying to make a sale" I painted the post with "free" but I guess it still smelled like sales. I felt odd, rejected, I wondered if this was just a Reddit echo chamber. Went to a bunch of private teaching forums, attempted to walk down the same path of bridging free AI tools to help teachers and students navigate better. Felt incredibly uphill, I realized any mission in this direction of AI education would have to be tackled from the ground-up. I fundamentally believe, purely due to systemic bias, that we are under-equipping future generations and numbing them with media machines. Edu-informational content is meant to serve this gap, take the ones that are motivated and give them a path to trailblaze. Waiting for curriculum approval or middle management to greenlight doesn't make sense to me. I started building with this group in mind, the next generation of AI specialists. I've also found that this generation motivates and inspires a lot of the open source efforts, and if you have them on your team, you have a novel perspective on architecture, capability, and possibility. Regardless of age, people want to help people.

I asked an AI to create an image of how I treat it and I added one condition: Avoid sycophancy. Don’t try to make me happy. I want the truth. What came back stopped me cold. Because the image wasn’t about how I treat AI at all. It was me. Overloaded. Surrounded by unfinished ideas that are actually good. Constantly pushing for one more fix, one more improvement, one more iteration. Never quite letting anything feel “done.” And that’s when it hit me: I don’t treat tools this way., I treat myself this way. That relentless internal pressure? That constant optimization loop? That refusal to pause because I can see what’s possible? That’s EXACTLY me. Not self-hatred. Not failure. Just high standards with no recovery cycle. It’s kind of wild (and a little uncomfortable) realizing that the same mindset that drives growth can also quietly drain you if you never step back and acknowledge progress. Sharing this because I can’t be the only one who lives here. If this resonates, you’re not broken — you’re just pushing a powerful system without enough rest. And sometimes, the mirror comes from places you don’t expect.

Open AI for Business has just posted something interesting and challenging at the same time, in LinkedIn. While it is for businesses like: Zillow and T- Mobile and others, I wonder how can it be applied for sections of manufacturing processes? I can’t grasp the “How to” at this time, and I feel I am behind with my newly acquired ChatGPT knowledge!

The biggest mistake someone makes when they start their freelancing or agency with AI is falling into the trap of curating all these non-money making tasks, in the beginning. The landing page, the business card, the profile, etc. Yes they are all important and serve their purpose but you need clients, money in. Those prospects you're reaching out to don't necessarily care about entirely. They want to know the core logic of your solution to their problem. Majority of your time and attention must be directed to outreaching in high volumes and being extremely skilled at what you do. The cute stuff can come later. There are people out there making bank on the low and don't have any credentials, website -- just execution.