Seems like they're really going for a full ecosystem or suite of tools. No free version (outside of a trial) though, curious how it stands against its already market-dominant competitors Just came out today (December 3rd) https://workspace.google.com/studio/ Anyone playing with it yet? I imagine this would be an easier sell to enterprise clients that are already G-Suite native.

I have created a clone which I use all the time ans is really great and I am developing my book and so have developed a new clone to help me with this so my chats doesn't get lost in my main clone. Now I have been wandering about GPTs - are these the same as clones just available publicly? Can we monetise our clones or gpts or use as lead magnets. I have a coaching business and it would be good if I could create a private gpt which can be part of the package I offer. Anyway loving exploring this world.

How are they? Are they any good? I'm testing a few but I don't want to link and get mods to frown upon me lol Anyone have any success with batch producing content?

Anthropic just dropped Claude Opus 4.5, and if you've been paying attention to the AI race, this is a big deal. Not because of hype. Because of what it actually does. The announcement: Claude Opus 4.5 is now the most capable model Anthropic has ever released. It's smarter, faster, and significantly better at complex reasoning than previous versions. According to Anthropic's testing, it achieves new state-of-the-art results across major AI benchmarks, outperforming both its predecessors and competing models from other companies. The model excels at graduate-level reasoning tasks, advanced coding, multimodal understanding (processing text, images, and documents together), and extended context work. It can handle inputs up to 200,000 tokens, which means you can feed it entire codebases, lengthy research papers, or massive documents and have intelligent conversations about them. What's actually new: Opus 4.5 shows dramatic improvements in three areas that matter for real work: Better reasoning under pressure. The model can work through complex, multi-step problems more reliably. It's less likely to lose track of context in long conversations or complicated tasks. When you're working on something that requires sustained logical thinking over multiple steps, Opus 4.5 maintains coherence better than previous versions. Stronger coding capabilities. For developers and technical users, this matters. The model can understand complex codebases, debug more effectively, and write more sophisticated solutions. It's particularly improved at understanding context across multiple files and maintaining consistency in larger projects. Improved instruction-following. This sounds technical, but here's what it means in practice: when you ask it to do something specific with particular constraints or requirements, it's much better at actually doing what you asked instead of giving you something close but not quite right. Why this matters:

Anyone see any success putting all of this together for an interactive web page? Been building it in sprints/components but noticing rate limits having to be reset, it's a real blocker. I've been doing my planning with Claude 4.5 Sonnet and execution with Antigravity's Gemini 3, anyone gone down this rabbit hole before?