Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI Automation Club

866 members • Free

Data and Ai Automations

2.1k members • Free

AI Automation Society

425.6k members • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

329.1k members • Free

53 contributions to AI Automation Society
Multi-agent pipelines are not just a trend. They are a different way of building.
Six months ago, chaining multiple AI agents in a production workflow meant stitching raw APIs together and managing every handoff manually. That friction is mostly gone. Orchestration frameworks with persistent memory, conditional branching, and structured output enforcement make it possible to build sequential agent pipelines where each agent has a defined role and passes a validated output to the next. The part most people underestimate is the supervisor pattern. An orchestrator that delegates to specialised sub-agents and then runs a validation pass before anything moves downstream catches errors that would otherwise propagate through the system and corrupt the final output. Re-injecting the original task objective at each handoff addresses agent drift, the gradual degradation of context that accumulates when you chain multiple LLM calls without reinforcing the goal. The architecture is becoming standard for serious production builds. What frameworks are people here using for multi-agent orchestration? What patterns have made the biggest difference in reliability?
2 likes • 14d
@SuppBert Bert Good question. I try to keep the supervisor opinionated about objectives rather than implementation. It validates whether the output satisfies the original task, checks schema, constraints, and quality thresholds, and only challenges the reasoning when it affects correctness or creates inconsistencies. If validation fails, it routes the work back to the specific agent with targeted feedback instead of regenerating the entire pipeline. That keeps costs down and avoids introducing new errors into parts that were already correct.
2 likes • 14d
@SuppBert Bert I like that approach. Separating planning from execution seems to make the whole pipeline much more predictable. I have found that the supervisor becomes more effective when it behaves like a strict validator instead of another creative agent. Its job is to enforce the original objective, constraints, and output quality rather than rewrite work unless something genuinely fails validation. I have also been experimenting with re-injecting the original task objective at each handoff to reduce context drift, especially in longer pipelines. I would be interested to know how you've found the cost-performance tradeoff between stronger planners and cheaper executors as the workflows become more complex.
The real shift in production workflows is at the evaluation layer, not the execution layer.
Getting an agent to run is easy. Knowing whether what it produced is actually correct before it touches a live system is the hard part. Most workflows optimise for making the automation run. The real leverage is in making it fail gracefully. A supervisor agent pattern where an orchestrator delegates to specialised sub-agents and a validation layer checks every output against a JSON schema before anything gets written downstream catches the errors that actually matter. The other thing worth addressing is agent drift. When you chain multiple LLM calls, the model's interpretation of the original task degrades with each hop. Re-injecting the original objective at every handoff fixed that in every production build I have run. Build the evaluation layer first and the rest of the workflow becomes significantly more reliable without any other changes. How are people in this group handling output validation in production? What does your evaluation layer look like?
AI-powered proposal generation can cut your sales cycle time significantly
Writing a custom proposal after a discovery call is one of the most time-consuming parts of a service business sales process. An automation that captures discovery call notes, routes them through an LLM trained on your proposal template and past winning proposals, and outputs a draft proposal with the relevant case studies, pricing, and scope pre-filled can cut that turnaround from two days to under an hour. The LLM does not produce a finished proposal. It produces a 90% complete draft that the salesperson reviews, adjusts, and sends. The cognitive work is checking and refining rather than creating from scratch. Applied consistently across a sales team, the compounded time saving is significant. I recently mapped out and built a workflow around this concept, connecting discovery call data, CRM context, proposal templates, pricing models, and previous winning proposals into a single AI-powered system. The result is a streamlined process that reduces administrative work, speeds up client follow-up, and allows sales teams to spend more time selling instead of drafting documents. I'm interested to hear how others would approach this use case, what would you add or improve to make it even more effective?
AI-powered proposal generation can cut your sales cycle time significantly
0 likes • 21d
@Jeremy Bengtson Thank you for this long explanation and comment. I second the reasoning.
Content Repurposing Tool at Work. What could you do if one piece of content automatically became five pieces of content?
Most people create one piece of content and post it once. The same insight that belongs in a LinkedIn post can also become a newsletter, a short-form video script, a Twitter/X thread, and a community post. Manually adapting content for each format takes time most people do not have. I built an automation workflow that takes a long-form piece of content, routes it through AI with platform-specific prompts, and outputs five ready-to-post versions in a single run. Instead of simply summarizing, the AI reformats the content, adjusts the tone, changes the length, and rewrites the hook based on each platform's engagement style. One hour of recorded thought can become a full week of content distribution across multiple channels. I'm currently sharing this workflow with anyone who wants to streamline their content creation process. For any business person needing, this, reach out and tell me what would you use it for?
Content Repurposing Tool at Work. What could you do if one piece of content automatically became five pieces of content?
1 like • 28d
@Ahmad Khan Minimal. It basically gives you final outputs with variations so you choose the best variation and post it. You can choose to automate the posts as well.
0 likes • 27d
@Kazi Islam i really appreciate it. By the way am currently distributing the tool. I would really love to get feedback from businesses on how it has helped them with their content.
🚀New Video: Learn These 6 AI Skills Now (Before AI Replaces You)
AI is going to reshape or replace millions of jobs, but you don't have to switch careers or start a business to stay ahead of it. In this video I break down six AI skills that will futureproof your career no matter what job title you hold, from becoming the AI person on your team to knowing when a task doesn't even need AI. I also cover the last skill most people never think about, which is building your own unemployment insurance with multiple income streams.
8 likes • Jun 15
@Nate Herk Great work
1-10 of 53
Johnson Muhavi
5
354points to level up
@johnson-muhavi-2586
Ai enthusiast with adaptability superpower 👇Sign up on typeform using the link below and let's build together: https://typeform.cello.so/vQOdJJ1kLD7

Active 17h ago
Joined Oct 31, 2025
Powered by