Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Brendan's AI Community

26.2k members • Free

AI Realism Starter Hub

20.1k members • Free

AI Creator Profits

27.5k members • Free

AI Operators Club

15.3k members • Free

Useful AI • AI For Business

27.7k members • Free

Chase AI Community

73.6k members • Free

NextGen AI

48.9k members • Free

AI Automation Vault

25.4k members • Free

Maker Zero: Claude Code, AI

12.7k members • Free

2 contributions to AI Guerrillas
30 days, keyword-first titles, real volume, zero views. Where does the first play come from?
Hey fam, not complaining, genuinely trying to find the step I'm missing, and I'd love the @Jesse Hull 's read on this. I've been uploading for over a month on one artist project. 3 albums, 4 singles live and distributed. Every title keyword-researched the way it's taught here. No paid promo, no shortcuts, nothing off-book. Result: zero. Zero views on YouTube, zero streams, nothing on any platform. Not "low." Actually zero. Here's my problem with the model as I understand it. Search-based discovery assumes the platform will surface me to people who search. But platforms rank by engagement signals, completion rate, saves, repeat plays, watch time. A brand new artist has none of that. So there's nothing for the algorithm to rank, which means nothing gets surfaced, which means no engagement ever happens. That's a closed loop. Keywords make me eligible to be found. They don't seem to make me found. So my actual question: what produces the first 100 plays? Because if the answer is "keep uploading and search will find you," I've now tested that for a month with real volume and got a flat zero. I'm willing to believe I need more time or more releases. But I'd like to know the mechanism, not just the instruction. Specific things I'd love answers to: 1. On a project that worked for you, where did the first plays actually come from? Search results, or somewhere else? 2. Is keyword first really about being categorized correctly, rather than being searched for? Those are very different promises. 3. Has anyone here gotten a genuine cold start ? no existing audience, no playlist pitching, no ads, no friends, nothing, purely from title SEO? If yes, how long and how many releases before it broke? If someone has cold-started on SEO alone, I'll happily go do more volume and shut up. But I'd rather find out now if the missing step is an engagement seed, because that changes what I should be spending my time on. Thank you :)
0 likes • 4d
@Jesse Hull Fair enough, that landed harder than I meant it to, and I'll take the note on wording. Wasn't bashing anything and I've got no angle here, I've genuinely got respect for how much you put out for free. Point taken on the timeline too. I was treating one month as a verdict and it isn't one. I'll keep uploading and double down on whatever shows signs of life, like you said. Appreciate you taking the time this late. Back to work.
0 likes • 4d
@Mela Verde Really glad you raised this, and yes, please make the separate post. This is the question I was clumsily circling. I'd add one thing, I don't think a ban is the realistic risk. I think it's quieter than that. If a platform decides a title is manipulative, the cheapest thing it can do is nothing visible. just stop surfacing that track in search and stop feeding it into recommendations. No strike, no notification. The release just sits there. And here's what makes this genuinely hard to reason about, that outcome is indistinguishable from simply being new. A suppressed catalog and a brand new catalog both look like zero. So none of us can actually tell which one we're in, including people who are winning, who'd just look lucky, and people who are stuck, who'd just look impatient. Which means "I haven't had issues" can't settle it either way, because nobody would ever get told.
Is Youtube Blocking AI Music?
Hello Guerrillas. As you already know, Youtube releases are taking a very long time to appear (or sometimes not appearing at all). Even after resubmission, many days have passed and I still can’t see the albums... This makes me wonder, is Youtube adding more restrictions on AI music, or declining it altogether? What do you think?
1 like • 6d
Yes, I know about this. suno always leaves a watermark in the song, but honestly, no software or tool can strip it out because the watermark is embedded in the actual audio itself. The only thing these tools can usually remove is the metadata. Also, most distributors use industrygrade AI detection systems, not the consumer AI music detectors you find online. If your music passes detectors like Authio, then it's probably legitimate. Otherwise, those "watermark removal" tools are just stripping metadata, they aren't removing the actual audio watermark.
0 likes • 6d
@Jake Musician exactly !!
1-2 of 2
James Rataz
1
1 point to level up
@james-rataz-7171
Still learning

Active 4h ago
Joined Jul 3, 2026
Powered by