Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Vibe Life Labs

74 members • Free

AI, Sales, Beer

726 members • Free

CM
Construction Management

5 members • Free

AI Money Lab

84.8k members • Free

AI Innovators Network

67 members • Free

AI Income Lab

2.9k members • $29/month

AI Automation First Client

1.8k members • Free

AI Automation (A-Z)

163.6k members • Free

AI Automation Society

419.8k members • Free

21 contributions to AI Automation Society
🚀New Video: I Turned Claude Fable Into The Ultimate Second Brain
My entire life and business now live in one second brain, and Claude Fable understands it better than I do. In this video I walk through my full Claude Fable AI operating system using the four Cs framework: context, connections, capabilities, and cadence. You'll see exactly how my files and folders are set up, how I keep improving it every day, and the usage tips I rely on to get more out of it.
4 likes • 25d
we are moving forward to something we don’t know either……
Two paths into AI work (which one is yours?)
Most YouTubers show you a single path into AI work: start an automation agency → take clients → sell automations. It works. I know because I built an AI automation agency and sold it. But it's not the only way in, and for a lot of you it's not even the best one. I made this video to break down the two real paths: The AI Career Opportunity Nobody is Talking About in 2026 Here's the quick version: Path A is the agency play. You go independent, take clients, build your own practice. Path B is the employment play. You become the most AI-fluent person in the room, and that's who companies want to hire or promote for AI work. If you're already employed, you become the obvious pick when an AI role opens. If you're looking to get hired, or move somewhere better, you walk in with real work instead of just claims. It's the less obvious path, but it's actually the more common one. The employment numbers (see the video) are shocking actually. Watch the full breakdown in the video. Then do one thing for me in the comments because I'm super curious: Tell me which path you are on. A, B, or both. And one line or so on why. I'll be reading these. Nate
Poll
1093 members have voted
3 likes • 25d
Thanks bro
Meta ad agency in a box.
Nobody got into marketing to spend their Thursdays formatting spreadsheets. But that is where a lot of teams end up. Not because they are disorganized or under-resourced. Just because the way Meta advertising works right now, a huge portion of the actual time spent is not on thinking or strategy. It is on doing things that, honestly, should not require a human at all. Creating ad variations for a product launch. Checking what competitors are running this week. Writing up a performance summary for a client who wants it by Monday. These are not high-skill tasks. They are repetitive, time-consuming, and they sit right in the middle of every marketing team's week, every single week. And the cost is not just time. Every hour your strategist spends building a report is an hour they are not spending on the next campaign. Every day your creative process takes longer than it should is a testing cycle you did not get to run. Every week your team is manually monitoring competitor ads is a week where the market is moving and you are reacting instead of leading. That gap, between where teams are spending their time and where they should be spending it, is exactly what this system closes. Three AI agents. One generates product ad creatives and copy automatically. One monitors competitor ads from the Facebook Ad Library and surfaces the insights that matter. One pulls your Meta data and builds branded client reports without anyone having to touch a template. The outcome is not just that work gets done faster. It is that your team's actual capacity changes. You can handle more clients without adding headcount. You can run more creative tests without increasing your production timeline. You can give leadership and clients better visibility into performance without that visibility costing you hours to produce. For a CEO or a COO, this is an operational efficiency question. The same output with significantly less overhead. For a CFO, this is a margin question. Marketing is expensive. When a portion of that expense is going toward manual tasks that a system can handle, that is worth looking at.
0 likes • Jun 6
@Dhanush Dan I appreciate.
🚀New Video: Claude Code Just Got Another Huge Upgrade
Anthropic just dropped Computer Use for Claude Code, which lets it natively control your mouse, keyboard, and take screenshots to interact with any app on your desktop. In this video I walk through how to enable it, demo it sending files through ClickUp and controlling my Mac remotely from my phone using Dispatch, and cover the current limitations you should know about. It's in research preview right now but there are already some seriously cool use cases here.
4 likes • Mar 24
It’s like crazy 🔥
🚀New Video: Stop Learning n8n in 2026...Learn THIS Instead
Stop learning n8n in 2026. Seriously. If you’re still trying to learn n8n in 2026, you might be focusing on the wrong thing. In this video, I explain why you should stop learning n8n in 2026 and what you should learn instead. If you’re thinking about learning n8n in 2026, watch this first. I break down why some creators say to stop learning n8n in 2026, what the better alternative is, and how you can stay ahead by learning the right automation skills instead. Enjoy!
3 likes • Mar 22
I think nothing replaces nothing….. it’s all about getting better experience & more values
3 likes • Mar 22
@Elly Dgn n8n is base where you can build Automation systems by connecting many AI tools……
1-10 of 21
Ishan Tishya
4
22points to level up
@ishan-tishya-1806
Automation Engineer & System Architect Helping agencies & businesses automate manual work (Save time, costs) Lead Gen, CRM, & many customAI systems

Active 2d ago
Joined Feb 13, 2026
Powered by