At the beginning of every month, I like to pause and ask: what do I actually want to achieve this time. For a lot of people, it’s not about doing everything, it’s about building better habits, getting clearer, being more consistent, improving health, growing income, or creating more meaningful connections. This month, what are you hoping to work on or gain, personally, professionally, or mentally? Would love to hear what you’re focusing on.

I have everything in place and know what should I do but I got too exited. I have idea or some plan and then it gets me and I procrastinate! I do not know if someone else is expecting this? Feels like I have already done it and now I want to do something else… Any info on this is appreciated 🙏🏻

I built a custom integration that lets n8n's AI Workflow Builder use Claude models (Sonnet 4.5, Opus 4.5) without paying per-token API costs. It's working. And it changes everything about how I build automations now. --- 🎬 Watch the Demo (Video Above) In this video, you'll see me: - Configure the connection in n8n's settings - Select my AI model - Generate workflows with Claude — completely free No API key billing. No usage anxiety. Just pure building. --- 📖 Why I Built This When you're designing AI workflows, the real work is iteration: - Test a prompt → tweak it → test again - Add a node → see if the AI gets it - Refine → regenerate → compare results With pay-per-token billing, there's always that voice in your head: "Is this test worth it?" That friction kills creativity. I wanted to remove it completely. --- ✅ What It Looks Like Now I added a new section in n8n's Personal Settings: "AI Builder Connection" - One-click configuration - Choose your model: - Claude Sonnet 4.5 - Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking) - Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking) - Gemini 3 Pro - Connect once, build unlimited The AI Workflow Builder now feels like a creative partner, not a metered service. --- 🧠 What This Means for Building With this setup, I can: - Generate 50+ workflow variations in one session - Experiment with Opus-level reasoning for complex automations - Iterate freely without watching a billing dashboard - Actually enjoy the building process again It's the difference between "let me think if this is worth testing" and "let's just try it and see." --- 💬 Question for You I'm curious — how do you currently handle AI costs when building workflows? - Do you limit your experiments? - Use cheaper models even when you need more power? - Just accept the cost as part of the process? Drop your thoughts below 👇 --- 🚀 What Are You Building? I always love hearing what others are automating with AI: - Lead gen pipelines? - Content workflows? - Internal tools? - AI agents?

Does anyone know of some good quality and low cost lead scrapers that to use in workflows? Primarily to obtain email addresses…help would be much appreciated!

The consensus here is that Anthropic was 100% right. The name “Clawdbot” was super confusing, and tons of users in this thread admit that they thought it was an official Anthropic project. Kudos to both parties for handling the trademark issue amicably instead of burning everything down. That said, the thread also devolved into a huge hatefest for the phrase “And honestly?” in the developer's announcement. Seriously, y'all really, really hate that. Other hot takes: The announcement, clearly written by an LLM, is perceived as cringe. For those asking, Clawdbot (now Molty) is a tool for persistent context and automating your digital life. No one is particularly excited about the new name “Molty” either.