Hi all, I've had this platform for a while before NAP.org launched, I believe, but they did the paperwork first, so that's that! They are doing great things, and I love their work from what I read. Now I don't want to confuse new people or the two places, so we need another name for this skool. Any ideas, and the reason you have suggested this, would be great 👍 Thanks!

A recent awakening for me I wanted to share: I bought a £3k car from a dealer in Brum out of a warehouse Seemed dodgy and it turns out I might be right When I bought it, I decided to put it in a trust and figure out the insurance later - to make me find a way. I started getting driving offences and parking tickets from places in London that I have not been to in this car. (not been to London at all) so it was easy to figure out. 🚕 Someone cloned my car number plate (I think the dealer has mates) Now, I am delighted...😁 After handling 25 parking and driving offences that we did not commit. The realisation that they have no jurisdiction over a private trust and no address has sank in slowly but surely for me. Trusts are a move from owning to controlling, which is what they tell us we are moving towards. (Agenda 2030, Claus Schwab) So how to make this even more useful is a question I often ask myself?... What if we have a layer of Trusts with each trust above it operating in different rules and higher jurisdictions, all capped off with the highest rule of Law (Gods Law, Natural Law) Just like they do with shell companies and degrees of separation. The bible is the infallible truth according to the 'Confessions of Faith Ratification Act' If any agency tries to administer the BERTH CERTIFICATE/NAME/ENS LEGIS they have to go through each level of Legal/Law/Jurisdiction and have to take on Gods Law eventually. lol I'd love to see that! Ask and ye shall receive: I found a group doing exactly this: I am currently learning this, and the more I get in, the more I see the power of this strategy. The beauty is: -Once the trusts are done, you are protected immediately -All we have to do is administer the trusts as we go, just like we would look after a small business. Do the books and keep a record. (All can be done in AI) -Not much legislation to know/learn -Immediate protection (you could backdate it too) -All private -Once protected, we can carry on our learning at our own pace

This is the AI (Not a Person) letter (not a Notice) re my status on the electoral register:Re: Removal from the Electoral Register — Confirmation Requested To the Electoral Registration Officer, 1. BACKGROUND Approximately one year ago I contacted Tunbridge Wells Borough Council by telephone and spoke with a member of your electoral registration team. I requested at that time that my name be removed from the electoral register. I was informed that this would be actioned. 2. RECENT CORRESPONDENCE I have recently received a document from Tunbridge Wells Borough Council which appears to assert that I am legally required to respond to a requirement for registration. I note for the record that the obligation imposed by the annual canvass process is an obligation to respond to the canvass — not an obligation to register. Those are two distinct things and I treat them accordingly. 3. WHAT IS REQUIRED I write to request written confirmation from you of two matters: (a) that my name does not appear on the current electoral register held by Tunbridge Wells Borough Council; and (b) if my name does still appear on the register, that it is removed forthwith in accordance with my request made approximately one year ago, and that written confirmation of that removal is provided to me at the address above. 4. RESPONSE TO THE CANVASS For the avoidance of doubt and in response to any current canvass obligation: I confirm that I do not wish to be registered to vote. This letter serves as my response to any current canvass form issued to this address. I require written acknowledgement of this letter and written confirmation of the matters set out at paragraph 3 above within 14 days of the date of this letter. Yours faithfully

Just out of interest for the future which will undo the common-law system: ​Yes, officially adopting the Noahide laws as the supreme legal code would fundamentally transform the UK court system, replacing its secular, common-law framework with a religiously mandated legal structure. ​While the Seven Laws of Noah share conceptual overlap with many standard criminal laws already present in Western societies—such as prohibitions against murder, theft, and the mandate to establish courts of justice—codifying them as divine law would bring sweeping structural and ideological changes: ​From Secular Common Law to Religious Law: The UK court system relies on parliamentary legislation and centuries of common law (judge-made precedent). A Noahide legal system derives its authority from divine commandment as interpreted through Jewish legal tradition (Halakha), shifting the ultimate source of legal legitimacy from Parliament to religious text. ​The Mandate for Specialized Courts: The seventh Noahide law explicitly requires the establishment of active courts of justice to adjudicate the laws. Under traditional interpretations, these courts must specifically enforce the Noahide code and ensure judges meet strict religious and moral qualifications (such as the fear of Heaven and extensive knowledge of these laws). ​Reclassification of Criminal and Civil Offenses: Crimes would be viewed through a theological lens. For example, idolatry and blasphemy—which are not criminal offenses in modern British law (following the abolition of common-law blasphemy and blasphemous libel)—would become punishable offenses. ​Changes to Sentencing and Judicial Scope: Traditional interpretations of Noahide jurisprudence outline specific penalties for transgressions (such as capital punishment by decapitation for certain major violations under strict evidentiary rules), which starkly contrasts with the UK's abolition of the death penalty and its modern penal philosophy focused on imprisonment and rehabilitation.

Great chat tonight. This is the section from the Bills of Exchange Act 1882 I mentioned. Could it really be this simple? A signature on blank piece of paper... 20 Inchoate instruments. (1)Where a simple signature on a blank . . .paper is delivered by the signer in order that it may be converted into a bill, it operates as a prima facie authority to fill it up as a complete bill for any amount . . . F4, using the signature for that of the drawer, or the acceptor, or an indorser; and, in like manner, when a bill is wanting in any material particular, the person in possession of it has a prima facie authority to fill up the omission in any way he thinks fit. (2)In order that any such instrument when completed may be enforceable against any person who became a party thereto prior to its completion, it must be filled up within a reasonable time, and strictly in accordance with the authority given. Reasonable time for this purpose is a question of fact. Provided that if any such instrument after completion is negotiated to a holder in due course it shall be valid and effectual for all purposes in his hands, and he may enforce it as if it had been filled up within a reasonable time and strictly in accordance with the authority given. If anyone knows the BOE well, I'd love to hear what you think? Gary