Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Daniel

SE
Sermon Explorer

1 member • Free

Mexcoders

1 member • Free

Memberships

The Agentic Lab

2.2k members • Free

Chase AI Community

72.6k members • Free

AI Automation Society

426.4k members • Free

ContentHero Community

821 members • Free

Freedom Fastlaner

6.5k members • Free

SCALE by CreatorLaunch

7.2k members • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

329.3k members • Free

4 contributions to AI Automation Society
/Goal vs /Brainstorming
How would you guys compare these 2 skills? When would you use one over the other?
0 likes • Jun 15
@Larhdir Naël Right now I think in an iterative and incremental way. I start with and MVP (minimal viable product) in mind, and then launch. And then add new features. And I use /brainstorming for all that process. Getting feedback early is a great way to direct the next iterations.
1 like • Jun 15
@Malik Waqar This sounds very similar to my workflow, the only thing missing is switching to /goal after multiple brainstorming sessions and implementations.
Wiki LLM and AI OS doubt
I have to admit that I’m a bit confused by everything that has recently emerged around building an AI Operating System (AI OS). Let me explain. First, I came across the concept of a Wiki LLM, as described by Andrej Karpathy, and that seemed fairly straightforward to me. Then Graphiti entered the scene, introducing the idea of building knowledge graphs from complex relationships. However, it’s still not entirely clear to me whether Graphiti can be integrated into a Wiki LLM system to analyze complex resources such as Excel files, or whether it should be treated as a standalone system. And then there’s the AI OS concept itself. I’m not sure whether it’s intended to consolidate all these innovations into a single framework, or whether it represents an entirely different approach. I’m still at the beginning of my journey, and I’d like to build my own “second brain” in the most effective way possible, starting with the right tools from day one. Do you have any suggestions or recommendations on how to approach this?
0 likes • Jun 14
@Pasquale Merella please post you updates because I have the same doubts. I think I get FOMO on using the right setup and I keep things simple and not creating a whole OS. But after watching @Nate Herk 's video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QQ_INxAhRs) I'll trying to implement his concepts and use Wiki LLM.
Which model do you use?
With Claude 4 just dropping, interested to hear which LLm peeps are using as their go to for AI agents? Any reason not to use Claude 4 for general purpose use? Thanks in advance 👍
1 like • Jun 14
@Nate Herk talks about the superpowers skills. I always brainstorm a change before anything, it create a spec and plan that you can store for reference in the future. I tend to use more powerful/smarter models to do the plannning and less powerful for the implementation.
🚀New Video: Cursor Automations Clearly Explained (worth learning?)
Cursor just launched Automations, which are trigger-based AI coding agents that can launch automatically on events like PRs, Slack messages, and alerts instead of you manually prompting them. In this video I break down how they work, how they compare to Claude Code and OpenClaw, and why the fundamentals matter more than the tools. There are 7 core agent concepts (triggers, instructions, tools, models, sandboxing, state, and deployment) that transfer across every tool in this space. Learn one tool well and you'll do well no matter what comes next.
7 likes • Mar 6
At the beginning Nate mentions the FOMO on all of these changes and new feature from each company. Focusing on the our own general understanding of the concepts help lower that FOMO.
1-4 of 4
Daniel Valenzuela
3
44points to level up
@daniel-valenzuela-5927
I love software development and teaching!

Active 3d ago
Joined Mar 4, 2026
ESTJ
Powered by