Loop Engineering 🔄 + ICM 📂: Perfect match, or completely different things?
Hey everyone! 👋 I’ve been spending a lot of time thinking about how we build, and Loop Engineering have been popping up lately... I’m really curious to see how you all view the relationship between Loop Engineering and ICM. I’d love to get your quick thoughts on a few fundamental questions: 🤝 Do they naturally intertwine? To me, Loop Engineering is all about how the agent acts—creating autonomous cycles of execution, verification, and self-correction. On the other hand, ICM is about where the agent lives—using transparent folder structures and markdown files to manage context. Do you see them as a natural duo? Does a great autonomous loop need a clean file structure like ICM to keep from losing its mind? 🏗️ Can Loop Engineering be the framework FOR ICM? Instead of looking at them as separate tools, can we use the concept of Loop Engineering as the actual structural framework to drive an ICM workspace? For example, using the agent's looping logic to systematically move files from a 01_inbox to a 02_processing folder? Or do you think keeping the looping logic and the context methodology strictly separate is a better approach? 🤷♂️ Or are they just for completely different use cases? Are we trying to force a connection that shouldn't be there? Do you use Loop Engineering for heavy task automation, but prefer to leave ICM strictly for human-in-the-loop, highly readable research workspaces? 💬 What’s your take? - How do you define the connection between Loop Engineering and ICM? - Are you combining them in your current builds, or keeping them completely separate?