Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Benjamin

7 contributions to Clief Notes
The answer is 42. What was the question?
Deep Thought gave the perfect answer, and nobody knew the question 😄 I think many of us build with AI the same way, we get fast answers but never wrote down the real question. Here is my stressed out Deep Thought for the mood. I'm curious: what is the one question u should have asked ur AI before u started building?
The answer is 42. What was the question?
1 like • 22h
Hey claude can you help me deepen my cognitive biases especially WYSIATI so I think im trusting myself or you but in reality im just catching flies?
1 like • 12h
@Pascal Pollack I try to be aware of this as much as possible
The Picasso Complex — Optimize Yourself Before You Optimize Your Tokens
The Picasso Complex — Optimize Yourself Before You Optimize Your Tokens Give Picasso and ten other people the same brushes, canvas, and instructions. You’ll get eleven different paintings. The difference isn’t the brush. It’s the person holding it. I learned this long before AI. I started shooting weddings with a cheap camera while others insisted you needed two Canon 5Ds and thousands of dollars in equipment. Eventually, I earned enough to upgrade and even secured sponsorship from an American photography manufacturer. Today, I build AI systems using computers that are sometimes 15 years old, spare parts, a secondhand laptop from my neighbor, an old iPhone, and a GPU with just 6 GB of VRAM. And here’s what people misunderstand: My system isn’t designed to stay small. It’s designed to scale while already running on small hardware. I can add computing nodes, GPUs, local models, and specialized workers without rebuilding the entire architecture. The machines provide computing power. I provide the architecture. Hack the planet. Now I see people spending €16,000 on new Macs and complaining that their $200 AI subscriptions don’t provide enough tokens. Here’s a question: Have you considered optimizing yourself before optimizing your tokens? Stop drinking alcohol. Stop smoking. Stop spending hours mindlessly consuming Netflix and social media. Not because entertainment is evil, but because your attention, energy, and mental clarity are also resources. Maybe you don’t need a bigger context window. Maybe you need fewer distractions and a clearer idea of what you’re actually trying to accomplish. Better thinking can mean better instructions, fewer unnecessary iterations, and less wasted AI capacity. And while you’re optimizing, take a look at your actual life. Could you live in a smaller apartment? Reduce unnecessary expenses? Work fewer hours? Need less money to maintain the lifestyle you actually enjoy? Why optimize the price of your tools while ignoring the cost of your entire existence?
The Picasso Complex — Optimize Yourself Before You Optimize Your Tokens
0 likes • 4d
@Pascal Pollack This had me thinking for a while... The system evaluating the agents can have biases of its own (like you said)... (And mechanisms that challenge the individual and the evaluation process would be continuously improving)... The synthesized insights for that system (especially the structured disagreement one's would need a system of its own to determine what the 'structured disagreement' would look like)... The patterns that arise from that feedback loop is something I'm deeply fascinated by irl conversations... and its part of my biggest struggle at the moment (since the insight I've gathered over the years from this hasn't been captured... yet). I was (am) also thinking of working backwards from this but it leads to intense overwhelm at times and pops up more question marks than it does answers (trusting God and the journey helps with this paradox and it brings me to the thought of how or where the system would bring diminishing returns in terms of 'stepping on one's 'thinking'). (Even on what I said ^ we can have different perspective's of the same thing and reach the same conclusion OR have different conclusions that point to the same thing and when cognitive biases on all sides come into play it makes the 'structured disagreement' that much more difficult to qualtify). Much easier in person or on a call for example but even then its a highly complicated problem... But similar to the problem behind ICM that complicated problem likely has a simple solution 🤔. (Mini- neurotic rant for you lol) ^^^
0 likes • 3d
@Pascal Pollack Thats what im tryina put into words 🤣
What Can We Build Together?
Over the past few days, I’ve had some fascinating conversations here in this community, including a private chat with @Bryson Bossley . Those conversations got me thinking. And last night, I couldn’t stop thinking. One thought led to another. Ideas connected. Questions became bigger. And somehow, I ended up writing a speech and turning it into a video. So please, WATCH THE VIDEO FIRST. And if you recognize yourself in what I’m saying, if something in that message resonates with you… Come back and read this. ——— What Can We Build Together? 50,000 minds. Thousands of skills. Countless ideas. And yet… most of us are still trying to succeed alone. Think about that for a moment. What if the greatest opportunity in this community isn’t the next AI tool, another course, or another business? What if it’s the person reading this right now? Someone here might have exactly the knowledge you’re missing. Someone else might need exactly what you already know. And the strange thing is… Neither of you even knows the other exists. Isn’t that a tremendous waste of potential? I made this video because I believe we’re overlooking something extraordinary. It’s not another tutorial. It’s not a sales pitch. It’s a question we should all be asking ourselves. What could we achieve if we stopped trying to do everything alone and started combining what we’re already good at? Maybe we don’t need another thousand ideas. Maybe we need to connect the people who can bring them to life. And maybe it starts right here. Not with another complicated system. Not with another promise of success. But with people discovering each other. So let me ask you three simple questions. 1. What are you genuinely good at? 2. What do you need help with? 3. What would you build with others? Don’t overthink your answers. You don’t need to impress anyone. You don’t need to sell yourself. Just be yourself. Because somewhere among the people reading this, someone might have exactly the missing piece you’ve been searching for.
What Can We Build Together?
7 likes • 5d
1) I'm good at sales and recognizing cognitive biases in conversations (paradoxically harder to do for myself) 2) I need help with the technical side (I'm more on the creative side of the spectrum) 3) Anything that helps people with irreplaceable skills for the future (along the lines of 'a gym for the mind)
It was a messy process, but it did what I wanted :)
After going through a range of different emotions and spending hours reading and watching Jake's videos (including like 20 different rabbit holes), I finally got the output from my system that I was looking for! (Still needs some more steps to go through of course) Sharing it below >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The big problem: You know things most people don't. It took you years to learn them, and nobody else has your exact mix. But it's all tangled up in your head. So the people who need you most can't tell you're the one they need. This breaks into six smaller problems. Each one gets you ready for the next. 1 · Getting it out You can feel what you know. Putting it into words is the hard part. So don't start by writing well. Start by talking, and catch what you say. 2 · Holding on to it You have an idea that feels big. Weeks later, it's gone. You can't use what you can't find. So old ideas need to come back by themselves, right when something you're saying now sounds like them. 3 · Choosing what matters Most of your thoughts won't go anywhere. A few are the real thing. And you're too close to them to see which is which. So take one thought and test it. Cover up where it came from. Does it still make sense by itself? 4 · Settling conflicts Sometimes a new idea disagrees with an old one. Don't hide from that. That's where your thinking moves forward. 5 · Putting it in order You see how everything connects, all at once. Your reader doesn't. Spreading out comes easily. Coming down to one clear line is the hard part. So put your thoughts in order, one after another, and look at the best case against them. 6 · Showing it What's clear to you is still invisible to everyone else. That distance is the last problem. A helper writes the first version from your thoughts, in order. Then you edit it until it's right. What you end up with: You get more than one finished piece.
1 like • 5d
@Gabriel Azoulay thanks 🫵
0 likes • 5d
@Patrice Roatan Quebecois 😆
New Classroom Series: Back to Basics 🧱
I wanted to create something specifically for those who are just getting started or feel like they are still beginners. There's a ton of talented people out there but this space is strictly for your day 1 questions about anything AI related. No question is too simple. What's a skill? What's an LLM? What's AI? Anything is up for discussion and we will answer your question. If the question warrants it, I will create a new classroom post out of it for you and others. See the classroom post here: https://www.skool.com/cliefnotes/classroom/b5143824?md=e95b3194dd06470fa01509821152ec20
0 likes • 7d
@Don Roy Thanks :) Would the 'desktop' be the same thing as 'this computer'? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- And here's come context from Claude about my folders >>> Who/what: I’m a solo operator (neurodivergent, runs a Skool community called Metaflow). I work with Claude Code on Windows, and everything lives on my Desktop (OneDrive-synced). I think in voice (Wispr Flow), so I produce a lot of transcripts, notes, drafts and small tools. The chaos, in numbers The Desktop has 15 loose project folders at the top level, plus about 15 loose files (zips, .md notes, .xlsx/.csv, a .pptx, shortcuts) with no grouping. Downloads has 66 top-level items. Documents is nearly empty. Several folders look like duplicates or spin-offs of each other: daniel-skills, chandler-bridge-skills and for-daniel-skool, plus matching .zip files on the Desktop. Metaflow_Workflow (9 old .md files from September), one-intent (a git repo), reports and research_notes. Small side projects, each a handful of files: ceremonias-game, lobera-game, phoneless-sales, breaking-artists-ground (a code project), agent-mailroom (307 files) and big-mojo-courses (193 files, about half of them .tmp junk). METAFLOW (the main one, about 1.4 GB and 23k files) It’s built as an “ICM” workspace, where the folder structure is the agent architecture. The rule is to always enter through CONTEXT.md, which names the active stage. The numbered stages run 01_intention → 02_discovery → 03_goals → 04_alignment → 05_plan → 06_research → 07_product. Each has a CONTEXT.md and an output/ folder. The supporting areas are: notes/ (133 files) shared/ (decisions, log, people, transcripts, handoffs) _config/ (canon, worldview, discernment) _content/ (94 files of copy, posts and outreach) _guide/, _templates/, projects/ and _archive/ (248 files) _library/ (reusable tools)
0 likes • 7d
@Don Roy I'll try them out, thanks!
1-7 of 7
Benjamin Hidalgo
3
7 points to level up
@benjamin-hidalgo-4865
Writer, salesman, lifelong learner.

Active 10h ago
Joined Sep 29, 2026
INFJ
TX
Powered by