Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Research Peptide Community

1.1k members • Free

Pep Talk - For Better Health

2.2k members • Free

RNS-Ravens Nest

5k members • Free

Good Looks Plus Shenanigans

693 members • Free

BougiePeps

1.3k members • Free

PS
Peptide Society

1k members • $10

Biohacking Peptide Playground

2.3k members • Free

The Peptide Daily Brief

436 members • Free

270 contributions to Peptide Price
⚠️ Important Legal Legislation Update from a Top Peptide Lawyer
Hey everyone, Just wanted to share an important message that Jeff Cohen put out from their firm's TikTok account this morning. For those who don't know, Jeff represents some major companies in the peptide space, so when he speaks, it's worth paying attention. Please watch the full video - I don't like to put words in anyone's mouth, and the full context matters here. From what I'm seeing, my assumptions seem to be correct that something bigger is coming. This isn't just about FDA 66-80 or the SAFE Drug Act - there appears to be something specifically targeting the research space as well. I know regulatory uncertainty is stressful for all of us, but staying informed is our best defense. As always, I will keep everyone in the loop as I learn more. Drop your thoughts below after watching 👇
⚠️ Important Legal Legislation Update from a Top Peptide Lawyer
3 likes • 20h
I still don’t believe that RUO can be shut down. There is a legitimate scientific purpose to have the RUO industry to advance science. Now I can foresee harsher penalties for distributors who sell to unauthorized parties and placing a stronger burden on distributors to verify the eligibility of customers to receive product because they are employed at a lab or as a credentialed medical researcher- but close down a legitimate industry. Sorry don’t buy it.
0 likes • 9h
@Pump Robbennolt I agree I didn’t think was any revelation in the video.
I finally wrote up my thoughts on Import Alert 66-80
My DMs have been flooded all week. "Derek, is this the end?" "Are prices going up?" "Should I stock up?" So I broke it all down: → What 66-80 actually does → How it hits compounding pharmacies (spoiler: it's real) → Why ALL research peptides might see price increases (not just GLP-1s) → The liquidation sales happening right now—and why I don't think 66-80 is the reason → What I'm actually watching over the next few months Short version: I've yet to see anything kill this space. I don't see it happening as fast as everyone's panicking about. But there ARE real implications here. Full breakdown 👇 https://open.substack.com/pub/derekpruski/p/fda-import-alert-66-80-what-it-actually?r=4jq1x8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
I finally wrote up my thoughts on Import Alert 66-80
2 likes • 1d
Good article and analysis
Critics of Reta
I wanted to solicit feedback from people who have an RS who DID NOT have success with Reta. I know you are out there and silent because Reta is so universally loved. Maybe your RS did better with Tirz. Maybe your RS had bad side effects and stopped? Maybe your RS got no results at all. Give me your stories please! I have a theory that I am trying to either validate or disprove. My theory is that Reta works really well for a certain type of RS, but not for everyone.
Daily reminder, the research doesn’t work unless you do
Quick reminder about all this fear mongering is going on with the GLP ones. Established the healthy lifestyle habits, and it’ll make your journey a lot easier. Whether it’s going on a walk with your family hitting the gym or playing a sport get out there and get active.
Daily reminder, the research doesn’t work unless you do
4 likes • 3d
Just did a nice 2.5 mile hike out here in the mountains with the dogs. That will do more for me than any peptide for sure.
Sign the Petition
2 Congressman from Indiana (home of Eli Lilly) sponsored legislation to place strong limits on access to compounded GLP-1 medications. Sign the petition to express your desire to keep compounding pharmacies free from regulations restricting access to peptides. https://c.org/4gv8qKVNKN The federal SAFE Drugs Act refers to a piece of proposed U.S. legislation introduced in Congress in December 2025 known as the “Safeguarding Americans from Fraudulent and Experimental (SAFE) Drugs Act of 2025.” It is not yet law, but it represents a legislative effort focused on tightening the safety and oversight of certain drug practices. Here’s the essence of what it’s about: This bill, introduced by Representatives Rudy Yakym and André Carson, aims to protect patients from unsafe compounded medications. Compound drugs are those created by pharmacies to meet the specific needs of individual patients — say a liquid form for someone who can’t swallow pills — but some compounded products have been mass-produced and distributed in ways that bypass the standard Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process. According to the sponsors and supporters, that can expose patients to untested and potentially hazardous medications. The SAFE Drugs Act would likely: - Increase FDA oversight and reporting requirements for compounded drugs so that regulators have better visibility into what is being made and where it’s going. - Raise safety standards to reduce the likelihood that unapproved or unsafe compounded medications reach patients. - Restore transparency and accountability in that segment of the drug supply chain that has grown rapidly without uniform federal controls. In simple terms, the bill’s core goal is to make sure that when a drug is created outside the usual FDA approval pathways — especially at scale — there are stronger safeguards so Americans aren’t exposed to fraudulent or experimental medications without proper testing and oversight.
1-10 of 270
Barry Freeman
6
1,420points to level up
@barry-freeman-5769
Husband, father of 3 boys, on a fitness journey

Active 45m ago
Joined Oct 4, 2025