Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Data Alchemy

38k members • Free

10 contributions to Data Alchemy
Empirical evidence of LLM’s influence on human spoken communication
"From the invention of writing and the printing press, to television and social media, human history is punctuated by major innovations in communication technology, which fundamentally altered how ideas spread and reshaped our culture. Recent chatbots powered by generative artificial intelligence constitute a novel medium that encodes cultural patterns in their neural representations and disseminates them in conversations with hundreds of millions of people. Understanding whether these patterns transmit into human language, and ultimately shape human culture, is a fundamental question. While fully quantifying the causal impact of a chatbot like ChatGPT on human culture is very challenging, lexicographic shift in human spoken communication may offer an early indicator of such broad phenomenon. Here, we apply econometric causal inference techniques [10] to 740,249 hours of human discourse from 360,445 YouTube academic talks and 771,591 conversational podcast episodes across multiple disciplines. We detect a measurable and abrupt increase in the use of words preferentially generated by ChatGPT—such as delve, comprehend, boast, swift, and meticulous—after its release. These findings suggest a scenario where machines, originally trained on human data and subsequently exhibiting their own cultural traits, can, in turn, measurably reshape human culture. This marks the beginning of a closed cultural feedback loop in which cultural traits circulate bidirectionally between humans and machines. Our results motivate further research into the evolution of human-machine culture, and raise concerns over the erosion of linguistic and cultural diversity, and the risks of scalable manipulation." https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.01754
3 likes • Jul 16
I often wonder if it is necessary to insert in my daily routine half an hour of (creative) handwriting in order to avoid loosing critical thinking...
Wild idea: a Data Alchemy book club?
While thinking how to recommend the book Nexus, and remembering there were some book talks before, I've had an idea: How about some kind of book club around the different subjects of this course? We could share all kinds of books about AI, Data Science from the instructional, reflexive, fun, motivational aspects. Edit: The Book Club is on and is here: https://www.skool.com/data-alchemy/data-alchemy-book-club?p=12996f1d
Poll
22 members have voted
1 like • Apr 18
Great idea!
6 months payment history is sufficient for credit scoring?
Hello Everyone, I'm currently working on an assignment to develop a machine learning program for calculating credit scores, and I wanted to reach out to tap into the collective expertise of this community. One of the approaches I’ve come across is basing the credit score on the payment history of the last 6 months. The payment history could be extracted from sources such as bank statements or mobile wallet transaction records. Before moving forward, I’d love to hear your thoughts on this approach. Do you think using a 6-month payment history is a reliable predictor of creditworthiness? Are there any other factors or data points you would suggest integrating for a more robust model? Any feedback or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Looking forward to your insights.
0 likes • Feb 10
collecting data from social media interaction might be interesting but there are some regulatory hurdles to overcome
1 like • Feb 10
(and many bad habits too)
AI Act - unacceptable risks
The EU Commission has just published the guidelines to clarify how to properly assess if an AI system poses unacceptable risks to humans (and thus cannot be commercialised within the EU market). Only an egyptologist can understand them properly but I will put all my efforts to clarify them anyway. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/commission-publishes-guidelines-prohibited-artificial-intelligence-ai-practices-defined-ai-act. Any suggestion is welcome!
1 like • Feb 5
@Christian Willig it is indeed. These Guidelines clarifies some vague terms used in the AI Act. They also provide for some clue on the "generative AI" aka LLM which exploded with the Chatgpt hype one month before the sign of the Regulation itself, leaving much of the concrete applications not regulated at all. Share with me your ideas whenever you want! 😉
0 likes • Feb 6
@Christian Willig I foresee your expertise in software engineering will make the reading puzzling: unfortunately these are norms written by individuals with 0 technical knowledge. Yet, I strongly believe it is possible to interpret them in a tech and business oriented way in order not to soffocate innovation
OpenEuroLLM: what's your view?
The EU has announced a $56M investment to develop this new open-source large language model. Apparently it will provide for fully open models, software and data (that can be fine-tuned at a later stage). The final purpose is to create an open-source LLM - ex ante in compliance with the (burdensome) EU regulations - that European firms and public authorities can build upon. Here you can find the press release: https://openeurollm.eu/launch-press-release. Views?
0 likes • Feb 4
A part for the human capital China enjoys (tons of STEM laureate), it seems EU is lagging behind due to the low VC investment made (expecially compared to the US). Hard times ahead
0 likes • Feb 4
EU is the very first continent where AI is strictly regulated. Maybe tomorrow California will follow (as it did copying the GDPR)...
1-10 of 10
Andrea Aguggia
3
39points to level up
@andrea-aguggia-7749
Swiss / Italian PhD researcher in Law and Economics

Active 126d ago
Joined Jan 30, 2025
Lugano
Powered by