Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI for Professionals

178 members โ€ข Free

The Language Renaissance

2.7k members โ€ข Free

4 contributions to AI for Professionals
๐ŸŽ‰ 100 members in just a few hours โ€” welcome aboard
Didnโ€™t expect to be writing this today, but here we are. We crossed 100 members within a few hours of opening this community. That tells me one thing: a lot of professionals are thinking seriously about how to use AI well, not just loudly. To mark the moment, hereโ€™s something worth reflecting on: The real power of AI isnโ€™t speed. Itโ€™s reducing friction between thinking and execution. Used poorly, it creates noise. Used well, it helps you: - clarify what you already know - structure messy ideas - test decisions faster - move forward with less mental drag Thatโ€™s the spirit of this space. If youโ€™re new here: feel free to introduce yourself. What kind of work do you do โ€” and what do you hope AI can help you think or execute better? More soon.
๐ŸŽ‰ 100 members in just a few hours โ€” welcome aboard
1 like โ€ข 1h
Hats off to u, master! Thx for having me, I'm always picking up so much. So, it's been brilliant following your lead, sir! The sky's the limit, to the moon! Cheers! ๐Ÿป
๐Ÿค– Three language models I use regularly (and how I actually think about them)
People often ask which AI tool is โ€œthe best,โ€ and the honest answer is: it depends on how youโ€™re using it. Right now, the three language models I use the most are ChatGPT, Grok, and Claude โ€” and while thereโ€™s a lot of overlap between them, each one has a slightly different โ€œpersonalityโ€ and strength. ChatGPT is the one I have the deepest relationship with. I use the paid version and itโ€™s part of my daily workflow โ€” planning, thinking, structuring ideas, writing, decision-making, and turning messy thoughts into something usable. Itโ€™s extremely versatile, especially if you learn how to work with it over time instead of treating it like a one-off prompt machine. Grok has a different flavor. I use it a lot for image generation and short visual assets that can be repurposed for marketing or content. It also feels a bit more unfiltered in how it reasons and frames ideas, and it has access to real-time information from X, which can be useful depending on the context. I wouldnโ€™t replace ChatGPT with it โ€” but I wouldnโ€™t want to lose it either. Claude is very strong when it comes to long-form reasoning and detailed explanations. When I want a more careful breakdown of an idea, a structured critique, or a thoughtful expansion of something complex, Claude often shines. Itโ€™s especially good for clarity when things start getting abstract. The important point isnโ€™t choosing one โ€œwinner.โ€ Itโ€™s understanding that different tools are better for different cognitive jobs. Over time, you stop asking โ€œWhich AI should I use?โ€ and start asking: ๐Ÿ‘‰ What am I trying to think through right now? ๐Ÿ‘‰ Do I need speed, structure, creativity, or depth? Thatโ€™s where AI really becomes useful โ€” not as magic, but as leverage. If youโ€™re curious: which one are you using the most right now, and for what?
๐Ÿค– Three language models I use regularly (and how I actually think about them)
3 likes โ€ข 6h
@Joรฃo Felipe de Mello Araujo and @Jacob Gonzaga , I'm not sure if u lot r familiar with it but NotebookLM is an AI that analyses documents without consulting external sources, right!? Everything is based solely on the sources u add to the project, which is a proper game-changer, as it avoids the influence of pre-trained biases common in standard LLMs. Btw, in the latest version u can pull in external data but only if u specifically request it. Based on ur files, it generates summaries and extracts whatever information you demand. So, u can ask it anything about the txt... pinpoint a specific theory, cross-reference concepts, or even ask it to vet whether an idea of urs holds water based on the provided sources. I reckon for anyone working with heavy reading, it's a must-have tool. It even suggests questions if u r struggling to formulate them. And then there's the Audio Overview feature, sort of a podcast-style conversation between two actors that provides a remarkably accurate and well-crafted summary. Of course, this will never replace human critical thinking, blindly trusting it is a bit of a mistake, as its analysis is strictly bound by the text and the LLMโ€™s architecture. It lacks the nuance of human reflection, at the end of the day, it's just a powerful neural network consolidating and organising data, rather than "interpreting" it. So, u still need a baseline mastery of the subject, but as a tool, it's a massive leg-up for productivity, especially when u're short on time. And what's the real kicker? It reads in any language and discusses it with u in whichever language your interface is set to. If I haven't forgotten anything, that's about it and that's me done! hahah Cheerz, mates! ๐Ÿป
2 likes โ€ข 3h
@Philippe van Mechelen There's no turning back now, mate! I'm chuffed I could help. Onwards and upwards! Cheerz!
AI hallucinations: when confident answers go wrong ๐Ÿง โš ๏ธ
AI hallucinations are real โ€” and they catch people off guard. Iโ€™ve been using AI daily for work for a long time now, so Iโ€™m used to its strengths and its limits. But recently, I noticed something interesting. A few family members and friends โ€” smart, capable professionals โ€” started using AI more seriously. And almost all of them hit the same wall. They asked a reasonable question. The answer sounded confident. It was written well. And it wasโ€ฆ wrong. That moment tends to be frustrating, sometimes even a deal-breaker. Not because the mistake was catastrophic, but because it breaks trust. Hereโ€™s how I think about hallucinations: - AI doesnโ€™t โ€œknowโ€ when itโ€™s guessing - Fluency โ‰  accuracy - Confidence in tone is not a reliability signal Once you internalize that, hallucinations stop being shocking โ€” and start being manageable. In my own work, I reduce the risk by: - Asking AI to show its assumptions or reasoning - Forcing constraints (โ€œIf youโ€™re not sure, say soโ€) - Treating AI output as a draft or hypothesis, not an answer - Verifying anything that would matter if it were wrong AI is a powerful thinking partner. But itโ€™s not a source of truth โ€” and pretending it is usually backfires. Iโ€™m curious: Have you personally run into an AI hallucination that caused confusion, wasted time, or a real problem? Or have you developed a habit that helps you catch them early?
AI hallucinations: when confident answers go wrong ๐Ÿง โš ๏ธ
0 likes โ€ข 6h
Let's go, I'll use an analogy from a Philosophy of Mind module I took at university, where a cat was used as the example. For an AI to recognise a cat, it requires an infinite number of data points (countless photos and bits of information) to identify one. It's essentially an overlay of data in pursuit of the most precise common result possible. A human, on the other hand, only needs to look at a cat once and be told what it is... from then on, u know, without any need to accumulate vast libraries of images. Okay, what does this mean? It means that using data selection and combination as a necessary base for a precise conclusion requires, as a prerequisite, the volume of data retained. In other words, precision and prior data retention are directly proportional: the more information retained, the higher the precision achieved, right?! But what does this have to do with our subject? Here's the kicker... with so many possible outcomes, there's a much higher chance of error. A single mistaken selection of a term influences every subsequent term, compromising the accuracy of the entire result. In simpler terms, it's pure probabilistic selection and combination.
1 like โ€ข 6h
Realising this helps us see that there's no soul in it, no emotion, just binary signals and raw digital data. Once u remove the human element from the equation, u stop expecting human-like outcomes and start playing the game for what it truly is. Sounds a bit muddled, doesn't it? But it's actually quite straightforward! ahaha... Btw, ur GIF was proper brilliant! Hahaha Cheerz again! ๐Ÿป
Welcome to AI for Professionals
Welcome โ€” glad youโ€™re here. This group is for professionals who want to use AI practically and intelligently in their work. The focus is on clarity, execution, and real-world application โ€” using AI as a tool to think better, structure ideas, and move forward with less friction. I use AI daily across different parts of my business โ€” from planning and decision-making to writing, structuring projects, and testing ideas. Over time, Iโ€™ll be sharing how I approach this in a practical, grounded way, based on what has actually worked for me. The goal of this space is simple: to explore how AI can genuinely support professional work, help reduce hesitation, and make execution feel lighter and more consistent โ€” regardless of your field. You donโ€™t need to fit a specific profile to be here. If youโ€™re a professional, educator, or creator who values clear thinking and practical application, youโ€™ll find this useful. If youโ€™d like, feel free to introduce yourself and share what youโ€™re hoping to learn or explore here. Youโ€™re also welcome to just observe and take things in.
Welcome to AI for Professionals
2 likes โ€ข 8h
A lifelong and humble student of languages and philosophy... an environmental manager by choice and a teacher at heart, who enjoys following the best in the field to keep on learning. It goes without saying that I'm a staunch admirer and an unconditional user of AI, that would be a bit redundant, wouldn't it? I am here, after all! ahaha Cheers, everyone! ๐Ÿป
1 like โ€ข 8h
And welcome everyone! ๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿ˜Ž
1-4 of 4
Alexandre Mask
2
5points to level up
@alexandre-levy-7628
Naturphilosophie, Sprachenliebhaber, (+๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡น-)

Active 38m ago
Joined Jan 22, 2026
ENFJ
Salvador/BA