Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Charlie

Helping pastors get in shape & lead by example using Bible based fitness (and lose 20-50+ lbs).

Make $3,000/mo with your Christian coaching business.

Skoolers
150.7k
Free
34 contributions to Skoolology: The Skool Lab
🔬 Research Lab: Are We Looking for Members in the Wrong Places?
Todd and I have been thinking about something lately. We spend so much time figuring out what happens inside our Skool communities. How do we welcome people? Help them connect? Keep them engaged? Make sure they're getting something meaningful from being there? But there's something that happens before any of that. People have to find us first. And that has us curious... Do we really understand how people discover the communities that could help them? We post, network, make videos, share links, and try different ways to get noticed. But are we showing up where the people we want to reach are actually looking? Here's what makes this especially interesting to me. They may not even be looking for a community. They may be looking for an answer, a solution, a connection, or simply someone who understands what they're going through. So Todd and I are beginning a new research project here in Skoolology. We want to better understand what happens before someone discovers a community. Where do people go when they need help? How do they come across communities they didn't know existed? And what can we learn about helping the right people find the right places? We'll be looking at research, paying attention to real conversations, exploring different discovery paths, and testing some things ourselves. And we'll share what we learn along the way. The useful discoveries, the surprises, and yes, probably a few things that don't work! 😂 Here's why we're doing this. I don't believe every community should have to follow the same growth playbook. The people looking for AI automation help aren't necessarily searching in the same places, or in the same ways, as people looking for health support, personal growth, or a little breathing room. The better we understand those differences, the better decisions we can make about where to spend our time and energy. That's what I hope this research will help us do. No extra assignments or homework for anyone.❤️ We're doing the digging, and we'll bring what we discover back here for you to consider in your own community.
🔬 Research Lab: Are We Looking for Members in the Wrong Places?
4 likes • 11d
The first one that comes to mind is Synthesizer. I first found it years ago when Andrew Kirby had a full Hormozi library lead magnet. I kind of forgot about it, then when I got on Skool myself years later I realized it was the same group and person. So basically Andrew’s content got me there
Printable One Word Frameworks
I'm updating all our frameworks and also making things more sharable/printable/etc. Here's an example from @Charlie Schaffer Thriving one word Framework from our intro post. I'm also making every framework we have more flexible so when we provide those to you, you could more easily adjust for use in your own community. More to come on this soon. Who loves reusable frameworks?
5 likes • Sep 23
That's awesome! Thank you sir
Skool News, September 22, 2026: Condensed Overview
Don't forget we have a live call later if you have any questions. 1. Vision and mission - Skool aims to help 1 billion people find community and 1 million people go full time doing what they love. - - The internet makes a full-time income possible in almost any niche, no matter how unusual. - - Question: What's really holding most people back from pursuing their niche: skill, confidence, or the business side? 2. Creator burnout and the content treadmill - Creators are pushed to make more content, in more formats, on more platforms, just to hold attention. - It grew gradually (the boiling frog effect), and most who succeed at it have teams. - - Question: What other parts of your work have crept up on you without you questioning them? 3. The loudest win, not the best - - Algorithms reward attention because platforms sell ads. - Creators end up shaping content for the algorithm instead of the person they want to help. - - Question: How would your content change if it were judged only on how much it helped someone? 4. Flipping the 80/20 with Growth Boost - - Today creators spend about 80% of their effort on content and 20% on craft and community; Skool wants to reverse that. - - About 95% of creators polled prefer this model, even those with large audiences. - Some groups get more signups from Growth Boost than from YouTube channels with 300K to 400K subscribers. - Results aren't consistent for everyone yet, but the team believes they're close. - - Question: Why might having no marketing background be an advantage, and what might you need to unlearn? 5. Inefficiency in online businesses - - Too much time and energy goes into growth instead of serving customers. - The core idea: if someone's good at cooking, let them cook. - - Question: How much of your week goes directly to serving your members, and how much goes to everything else?
0 likes • Sep 22
Thanks Todd!
🎂 IMPORTANT SKOOLOLOGY RESEARCH 🎂
Today’s research question: Exactly how much cake is required to properly celebrate Sara's birthday? We’re going to need a LARGE sample size. 😂 Happy Birthday, @Sara Fredrick !! 🥳 I hope your day includes good people, lots of laughter, something delicious, and at least a little bit of doing exactly what YOU want to do. We’re awfully glad you’re here. 💛 Everybody help us wish Sara a VERY Happy Birthday! 🎉🎈
🎂 IMPORTANT SKOOLOLOGY RESEARCH 🎂
2 likes • Sep 17
@Sara Fredrick Happy late birthday!
I'm launching a LT offer ⚡️
My goal is to launch a LT offer to a brand-new community, drive eyeballs and conversions to get Growth Boost cranking for me, and do 100% of selling through DMs. If y'all are interested in specifics, maybe I could talk more about this? PS— ALL ADVICE WELCOME! Please help me make this a 10/10 launch ⚡️
2 likes • Sep 14
@Donna Thornton Their initial investment is what gets them from "interested in fitness" to "invested in fitness." After helping over 650 other guys with a free fitness offer, I've noticed that investment tends to equal better engagement and results. I've even noticed this in myself: Paying for a program helps me stay locked in, but only using free programs tends to fall off fast. It makes the discomfort of a fitness offer worth enduring, compared to a free offer. And the HT offer only comes later, when someone has needs for higher support/customization levels. The LT gives them a program to follow; the HT builds a lifestyle that sticks with it for good.
1 like • Sep 14
@Donna Thornton Agreed! Tangibly, they immediately receive access to the training program they’ve bought. Community-wise, the onboarding gives them a “Locker,” somewhere to track their journey. They’ll get personal outreaches, encouragement from the others in the group, and immediately start setting records in the gym. On top of that, we’ll run friendly competitions with real-world prizes, so there are stakes for effort AND outcomes. And everyone is constantly competing to get their name on a “Trophy Room” board (a classroom page with pinned posts as people share wins). All of this means the community is about THEIR success, not particularly MY programming, even though that’s what they’re initially buying.
1-10 of 34
Charlie Schaffer
5
347 points to level up
@pastorswole
Pastor + fitness coach. Helped 500+ pastors get fit. Now helping Christian men become the strongest man in their church ⚡️

Active 16m ago
Joined Jun 15, 2026
ENTJ
skool.com/solomon
Powered by