Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Marty

Make More Sales

122 members โ€ข $17/month

My Make More Sales Model is designed to give the full picture to generating sales online. Join my group for 1on1 guidance. No fluff. No Jargon.

$1 Freedom Assets

44 members โ€ข Free

Bag a deal at prices you'll never find else where.

Memberships

218 contributions to AI Automation Society
Beginner in AI Automation (n8n) โ€” Looking for Practical Training Opportunity
Hello everyone! Iโ€™m new here and also new to learning AI automation with n8n. Iโ€™ve cleared some basics and have built a few workflows and AI agents by watching YouTube tutorials. Iโ€™m currently looking for a senior or experienced person who can train me and let me work alongside them, so I can learn practical skills like delivering AI agents to clients and handling real projects. I donโ€™t need any money โ€” I just want to learn and gain hands-on experience.I humbly request anyone whoโ€™s willing to guide me to please connect ๐Ÿ™
2 likes โ€ข Oct '25
Your approach of wanting hands-on experience over money is smart, but you might be skipping an important step: you probably already have enough skills to start getting paid. Here's the reality check: most beginners overestimate what they need to know before charging for work. If you've built a few workflows and AI agents from YouTube tutorials, you're already ahead of 99% of small business owners. Here's what I'd recommend instead of looking for unpaid mentorship: 1.) Pick one extremely specific problem you can solve. Not "I do AI automation" but "I build appointment booking systems for dental offices using n8n." Specificity = credibility. 2.) Build one complete workflow that solves that problem end to end. Document it obsessively. Screenshot every node. Write down why you chose each integration. 3.) Find 3-5 businesses in that niche who don't have the automation yet. Cold message them: "I noticed you're still handling [specific pain point] manually. I built something that automates it. Can I show you a 5 minute demo?" 4.) Charge something, even if it's $300 for setup + $50/month. The moment money changes hands, the psychology shifts. You'll learn 10x faster with a paying client than free work because the stakes are real. 5.) Document everything you learn. Every mistake, every solution, every client question. That becomes your knowledge base and your positioning. Mentorship is valuable, but nothing beats learning under pressure with real client projects. The best mentor is a paying customer who needs results.
0 likes โ€ข Feb 18
@Minal Gupta glad it helped. best place is in my group: https://www.skool.com/ai-for-business-1260
Use Perplexity in Make to get ANY info you want
In this video I explain how perplexity works, what it does and how to use it to make money. Any FEEDBACK is super important to me ๐Ÿซก
2 likes โ€ข Nov '25
Nice walkthrough! I've been using Perplexity's API in some of my n8n workflows but haven't tried it in Make yet. The fact that it returns sources and can pull real-time info makes it way more useful than just a basic LLM call for certain tasks. Would love to see a follow up on how you handle rate limits or caching when you're running these at scale. Thanks for sharing this!
๐Ÿš€ Antigravity: Googleโ€™s move to reinvent how we build with AI
Iโ€™ve been playing with ๐—”๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†, Googleโ€™s new IDE, and wowโ€ฆ this is not โ€œjust another editor.โ€ You can feel itโ€™s built from scratch with AI as the main character, not a plugin. Itโ€™s available from day one on macOS, Windows and Linux, completely free during the beta, and tied to your Google account. Pretty clear sign that later theyโ€™ll merge limits/pricing with Gemini plans โ€” so now is the moment to use it without fear. The best part: you get ๐—š๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ, ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿฑ, and a GPT-compatible model. Supercharged autocomplete, unlimited commands, and this weirdly smooth workflow where the IDE feels like it has your back the whole time. ๐Ÿงช ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ: ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ท๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ This one is wild. Antigravity includes a โ€œPlaygroundโ€ โ€” basically a lab โ€” where you just explain what you want to build and it generates a step-by-step plan. - The agent does everything: - sets up the structure - installs dependencies - generates code - documents the process - and lets you review & tweak every step And yes, you can have multiple agents working in parallel. One creates a new project, another improves a landing page, another fixes bugs, all neatly tracked in the Agent Manager. ๐Ÿ‘‰ It flips the old dynamic of โ€œI code and AI helps me.โ€ Now itโ€™s โ€œAI builds and you steer the project.โ€ ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿณ ๐—” โ€œ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ณโ€ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ป๐Ÿด๐—ป In the demo, they build a recipe app with a โ€œChefโ€ chatbot and connect it to ๐—ป๐Ÿด๐—ป via a webhook. The flow is simple: Antigravity โ†’ POST โ†’ n8n webhook โ†’ AI processes โ†’ response goes back โ†’ shown in the chat. Done. - Inside n8n you configure: - the user message - the system message (the chefโ€™s instructions) - memory - and a Respond to Webhook node to send the answer back ๐Ÿ‘‰ With just a few nodes, Antigravity + n8n turns a text box into a fully functioning recipe chatbot. ๐Ÿ“š ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—”๐—š + ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ To avoid the Chef โ€œhallucinatingโ€ dishes like a sleep-deprived contestant on MasterChef, they set up a small ๐—ฅ๐—”๐—š ๐˜€๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ using n8n + Google Drive + Supabase.
๐Ÿš€ Antigravity: Googleโ€™s move to reinvent how we build with AI
2 likes โ€ข Nov '25
This looks really promising. The fact that it's AI-first from the ground up rather than just bolting on copilot features is a big deal. I've been frustrated with how most IDEs treat AI as an afterthought. Definitely going to test this for some automation workflows this weekend. The multi-model access (Gemini + Claude) is smart too since different models are better at different tasks. Thanks for putting this on my radar!
Is it just me, or is all the โ€˜life adviceโ€™ online actually making life harder?
Ever feel like the internet is shouting at you? โ€œWake up at 5 AM.โ€ โ€œDo cold plunges.โ€ โ€œManifest harder.โ€ โ€œTry this habit.โ€ โ€œNo, try THIS one.โ€ Itโ€™s wild how a space meant to help us grow ends up overwhelming us so many voicesโ€ฆ so many โ€œrightโ€ ways to liveโ€ฆ that you donโ€™t even know which direction to move anymore. And hereโ€™s the truth nobody admits: Most people arenโ€™t struggling because they lack motivation. Theyโ€™re struggling because theyโ€™re drowning in too much information and not enough clarity. So instead of becoming better, they freeze. They scroll. They compare. They feel behind. If this hits a nerve, youโ€™re not alone. Information overload is real, and itโ€™s silently exhausting a lot of people. Whatโ€™s ONE piece of advice youโ€™ve heard lately that actually made things more confusing instead of helping?
0 likes โ€ข Nov '25
This post hit me. I went through a phase where I was trying to stack every productivity hack I found online and it just left me exhausted and more confused than when I started. What finally worked was picking like 2 or 3 things that actually fit my life and ignoring everything else. The noise to signal ratio with online advice is brutal. Most of it is just content for content's sake. Your gut usually knows what works for you better than any random thread.
If Your Revenue Feels Random, This Is Why
Most builders donโ€™t stall out because they hit the ceiling of their ability. They stall because the things they cannot see start running the business for them. And blind spots do not disappear with more effort, better tools, or a cleaner workflow. They disappear when you change how you think. Across this industry, the patterns repeat. Different niches. Different stacks. Different levels of experience. The symptoms vary, but the root constraints almost never do. Revenue swings without a clear cause. Offers feel solid internally but collapse in the market. Workload becomes reactive and unpredictable. Most builders chalk this up to execution. They assume the answer is more technical range, sharper tactics, or a new tool. But the real constraint is upstream. It is the decision logic that never gets examined. Skill solves tasks. Strategy solves plateaus. The most consistent pattern I see: pricing without a strategic anchor. Builders choose numbers based on what feels comfortable, not what reflects economic value. Price decisions drift with emotion instead of intention. And that one blind spot pulls them into low leverage clients, unstable cash flow, and projects that drain more than they return. Another pattern: improving the wrong variable. Builders chase new tools, new automations, new edge-case optimizations. Novelty feels productive, so they keep adding complexity instead of adding leverage. But momentum comes from leverage, not novelty. And the pattern that derails growth more than anything else: vague offers. When your offer is unclear, you rebuild scope, pricing, and delivery from scratch every time. No system compounds. No process stabilizes. Every project becomes a custom project. And custom guarantees inconsistency. These are not skill gaps. These are thinking gaps. Momentum comes from identifying the structural constraint, not from performing better inside the constraint. But most builders never make this shift. They overspend on implementation because implementation feels familiar. They underinvest in strategy because strategy forces them to confront the assumptions behind their results.
If Your Revenue Feels Random, This Is Why
2 likes โ€ข Nov '25
This really resonates. I spent way too long thinking I needed to learn more or get better tools when the real issue was how I was thinking about my funnel. Once I mapped out where leads were actually dropping off instead of guessing, everything clicked. It wasn't a skill problem, it was a visibility problem. Sometimes stepping back and looking at your numbers like an outsider would helps you spot things you've been blind to for months.
1-10 of 218
@martyenglander
Iโ€™ll show you how to get 3 new customers a day with quick 5-minute business fixes. Click here: https://www.skool.com/ai-for-business-1260

Active 5h ago
Joined Sep 19, 2025
ISTJ
Powered by