Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

InnerDevelopment@Work

512 members • Free

25 contributions to InnerDevelopment@Work
IDGs and union work?
This is more of a question than a statement for the group. In some work environments, talking about inner development can still be met with resistance, to say the least. I have recently become a union representative at my institution, and I am beginning to see quite a lot of alignment between union work and the IDGs. Although unions are often perceived mainly as dealing with administrative and legal complexities, I feel there is also something much more tangible and outspokenly human in this space: dignity, dialogue, responsibility, courage, care, and the protection of meaningful work. Has anyone here had experience with implementing the IDGs, or other inner development pathways, through a union framework or similar structures?
2 likes • 5d
Thank you so much Nadene, this is incredibly useful — and also somehow reassuring, because it confirms that this might be sort of an open space. What you wrote about unions already working with many IDG capacities, but through a different language and history, really resonates. Just recently, I attended a lecture by a union secretary from ver.di — one of Germany’s largest unions and the major service-sector union — focused on union organizing, recruitment, and collective power in "today's world" context. Although she did not use IDG language, many elements felt very aligned: mapping relationships and “white spots” in the institution, creating a small but stable active group that meets regularly, values-based communication, and especially 1:1 conversations based on active listening rather than persuasion. One sentence that stayed with me was that unions grow where people have a “place of encounter”. She also described the union as an “organized form of hope”, which I found very powerful. That connects strongly with the IDG dimensions of Relating and Collaborating — but also with the very practical reality that dignity, trust, courage and hope cannot be built through documents only. They need repeated human spaces — the kind of containers I mostly found in IDG networks like this one. So yes, maybe “inner capacities for social dialogue” or “inner development for just transition / collective voice” could become a very meaningful field. I am taking notes from your answer and will also bring some of this into a union meeting I have next week at my faculty. Thank you again for opening this up so generously 🙌
This week what are you up to?
Nudge nudge …Let us know what’s on your mind 🧐 How are you feeling? What’s your body telling you? Are there any skills you want to be experimenting with? What inspired you in the past days? Or is there something that is weighing heavy on your heart? If any of these questions resonate, step in and tell, ask, vent, process. Life is beautiful and tough No judgement We are all here together
This week what are you up to?
2 likes • May 19
This is a more heavy one, but your question really met me where I am this week. I have been dealing with the terminal stage of my mother’s illness, and moving through waves of rage around unfairness, suffering, lack of meaning, and all the painful parts of human condition. In that rage, I found myself digging out and sifting my composter — something I had never fully done before. And then I was there with worms, half-decomposed leaves and food scraps, noticing how everything was slowly becoming soil — teeming with life within death itself. I kept thinking or maybe hoping about how decay, pain, and transition can somehow become nourishment. I am still deeply uneasy with the suffering I cannot alleviate, but I feel a little calmer imagining that her energy, too, may eventually transform into something soil-like — something that keeps nourishing life in another form. So, nudge nudge — my current condition is nudging me into the ever-present search for meaning, even in the weirdest places 🥴.
Reclaiming Human Agency
Just coming out of this session on navigating AI, Social Fracture, and Polarization it was SO dense and we were deep into reclaiming our capacity to sense, know, and act amid forces designed to fragment our attention and polarize our communities. This session brought together ethical AI innovators with Tristan Harris, Nepun Mehta, experts in embodiment Manis Srivastava and collective sense-making, and practitioners navigating the economies of attention. Hosted by Otto Scharmer and Antoinette Klatzky and social artist Kelvy Bird. I'll need some time to share my notes! Please, I invite any of you who attended to add your own takeaways from any of the speakers that would be fabulous for us all to read. In the meantime, here is the graphic recording that Kelvy put together. I'm still listening to this phrase from Nepun: Love is deep data, with it we trust that inner coherence will lead to social coherence.💖
Reclaiming Human Agency
2 likes • Apr 6
Wow, sounds like the session was so deep and relatable for this time we live in.Thank you all for sharing the insights, especially for us who missed it 🙏❤️
What news sources are you reading that you would recommend?
I’ve been an avid reader of Le Courrier International for a long time as it takes news from global sources and publishes them in French. This morning reading about global politics I discover UNHEARD and am quite surprised and pleased with their work. Please share your recommendations on news worthy sources as we need to read and hear unbiased (if that still exists) coverage. Thank you 🙏
What news sources are you reading that you would recommend?
1 like • Mar 31
jimmy kimmel 😁 makes it way more easier to digest
What is community to you?
Most communities don’t fail because of content. They fail because of how people feel inside them. And this is where psychology come in. Not in a weird way. In a very practical way. Because every community creates a kind of “state” in people. 👉 Some feel safe to share 👉 Some just observe 👉 Some feel pressure 👉 Some disappear And that’s not random. It’s influenced by things like: – The way we write our posts – The expectations we set (or don’t set) – How we respond to people – How clear the structure is Small things… big impact. For example: If everything feels “too perfect” → people hold back If everything feels chaotic → people get lost If nobody leads → nobody moves What I’ve learned: People engage when it feels easy and safe enough. People engage around topics of interest People engage to share I’m curious: Have you thought about what community feels like for you?
What is community to you?
4 likes • Mar 21
that rare feeling of not needing validation...yet still feeling safe to share my own thought experiments openly, while learning through other people’s experiments too,..or through reflecting on a question like this one, @Nadene Canning I don’t experience that often, which is why I keep coming back here 😊
1-10 of 25
Morena Galesic Divic
4
63points to level up
@morena-galesic-6393
Assistant professor working at civil engineering faculty. Wrapped up in challenge of balancing research, teaching and the rest of the life :)

Active 4h ago
Joined Oct 18, 2024
Split
Powered by